On the back of Retro’s post about Danny Thompson, here’s something that doesn’t exist. I offered it freely to the label you would all think most likely to say yes and they said no – needing 2,000 sales to make something like this viable and not believing they’d get that. I think they’re mistaken about that non-viability, but it’s no skin off my nose. If anyone here wishes to offer it to other parties, go ahead. I can supply the unreleased audio. I think I’ve proved how badly wrong the existing archive music labels can be in deciding on viability with the current no-labels-involved-cos-they-didn’t-get-it Dick Gaughan box set (and associated releases) project.
That said, I offered it to a man at Ace three weeks ago via a mutual friend and he hasn’t had the courtesy to reply yet. I offered it to Earth a week ago. Fill in the next sentence yourself.
It seems like end times for the archive music labels (in the wake of Universal hiking their third-party licensing percentages up and fewer people buying physical music) if they’re all chasing easy-option licenses and re-re-re-packaging a smaller pool of music and taking no ‘risks’ / using no imagination » Continue Reading.
















