Year: 2026 Director: Christopher Nolan

The latest in Christopher Nolan’s one-man mission to Save Big Cinema, after Barbenheimer ruled summer 2023. Where better to go for another Big Story than one of the oldest Big Stories of them all. We went en famille, so had in the car to bring our youngest son up to date with the prequel story ‘When did the Iliad come out?’.

Nolan’s preference for non-linear storytelling goes a bit like this: the present day is his seven-day long weekend with Calypso (Charlize Theron) eating the lotus flower and generally chilling like Bond in Thailand before M gets on the blower one more time. Flashbacks to The Iliad itself are chiefly to two central episodes: the selection of soldiers to sail to Troy, which sets up a la Hunger Games Sinon taking the short straw actually given to R Patz’s cowardly Antonous; and the Trojan Horse sequence.

Intercut with the fall of Troy is the voyage home and the whittling down of the crew to the Final Man found by Calypso. A friend who saw this too commented these are generally find an island/encounter a monster/run very fast back to the beach. So we » Continue Reading.

Year: 2026 Director: Oliver Laxe

A dad and young son wander through a desert rave in Morocco, handing out a missing person pamphlet to anyone who will talk to them. It’s his daughter. No one has seen her, but there could be another rave coming up on the border with Mauritania, maybe she’ll be there? When the army come to break up the party, the father and son break loose and hook up with a tight older group of misfit party animals heading deep into the desert. Their journey becomes in turn, exhilarating, shocking, frightening and, perhaps, apocalyptic.

Don’t look up the plot; see this blind on the biggest screen you can find. The visuals and soundscape, which includes music by Kangding Ray are uncompromising and immersive. I guarantee that when you walk out of the screening you’ll want to talk to anyone you can, just to work out what you’ve just seen and decompress.

Might appeal to people who enjoyed:

Mad Max Fury Road, Pilgrim’s Progress, Stalker, Zabrinskie Point, El Topo

Year: 2025 Director: Alan Pattillo, David Elliott, David Lane

“Thank you, Meddings”

After twenty minutes of ads firmly aimed at an under 12 audience*, I, and the fifteen other 40-plus-year-old BLOKES in the cinema, finally got to see OUR Thunderbirds up on the big screen. And what a joy it was to behold. The pilot episode Fire In The Sky shows the boys’ first rescue. The Fireflash, a new atomic passenger plane is sabotaged on its maiden voyage when The Hood, who will be the Tracys perpetual tormentor attaches a bomb to the landing gear. Why? Not because he’s a terrorist, holding the world to ransom, but because – no less than the rest of us – he wants to see the Thunderbirds in action, although in his case he wants to know their secrets so he can make himself rich. Hood apart, the other thing that kept the lads busy was hubris, as in the second episode when a crazy scheme to move the entire Empire State Building a little bit to the side results in an unfortunately-timed catastrophe, requiring some improvisation by the Thunderbirds team.

Although the Fireflash is their very first public essay, Scott Tracy, charismatic » Continue Reading.

Year: 2025 Director: Rob Reiner

So can lightning strike twice? The original is of course up there with Airplane as the funniest film of all time, and it’s probably the film I have seen most often in my life (due in no small part to weekly Saturday night viewings in my student years, after the pub, accompanied by cheap cans and questionable hash).

I’ll keep this spoiler free but the good news is that it is intermittently amusing and no disgrace to the first. It helps that Rob Reiner is on board, and that having reprised the characters over the years the main trio of Guest, McKean and Shearer slip into their personae without the sometimes trying effort which the casts of Guest’s other films brought to their parts.

The basic set up is that Ian Faith has left his daughter, Hope, Tap’s contract in his will, and it includes a stipulation that they must perform one last show. This causes problems with the structure of the film which takes a while to get going as a result. Whereas the first was based around a disintegrating band on tour, allowing for regular songs, this one builds up to a single » Continue Reading.

Year: 2025 Director: Christopher McQuarrie

And so we arrive at the End Of A Major Film Franchise, now traditionally requiring a two-parter finale of bottom-numbing length. And so it is with MI8 and its just shy of 3 hours run-time. We saw it on a Sunday afternoon which seems about the right time, and on the big screen which is definitely the right place.

The plot, as is also traditional in MI films is both convoluted and nonsensical. Malware baddie The Entity is now taking control of all the world’s nukes to create some sort of Matrix-style nuclear post apocalypse world to rule over, where Mcafee and Norton are but a distant memory and there are no pesky humans to turn things off and on again. To combat it Tom must get into the sunken sub that started it all in the predecessor with his special key, and take a portable hard-drive together with another piece of code while avoiding the Russians who also…and returning Entity’s Representative on Earth Gabriel…before his own government…oh god this really does make no sense.

What’s great about this film, as with all the MIs is the set-piece stunt action sequences delivered through practical » Continue Reading.

Year: 1966 Director: Vera Chytilova

There are good films that are good, good films that are hard work, and a very small subset of good films that are profoundly irritating. While being good at the same time. So it is with Daisies, a 1966 film that fully deserves its poll numbers in the 2022 Sight and Sound poll as the 28th best film of all time.

Part of this irritation is definitely intentional. The two central characters, locked together in every scene, are blonde Maria and brunette Maria. The first scene, with their exaggerated high voices, childish intonations and doll-like movement set up one central idea in the film: that women are reduced to cartoon-like roles by the patriarchal society of sixties Czechoslovakia. After this prelude the main action of the film unfolds in a sequence of places in which the girls show an utter lack of respect for their male betters, and bring destruction and chaos wherever they go. They go to a restaurant and annoy the man who is paying for their meal by over-ordering. They get drunk in a nightclub and annoy the patrons. From their chaotic flat they call men and wind them up. Waiters, attendants, » Continue Reading.

Year: 1927 Director: FW Murnau

This is the 11th best film ever made, according to the 2022 Sight and Sound poll, and the latest in my sporadic walk through the lesser known titles – no need for another review of The Godfather or Apocalypse Now.

Here’s a counterfactual theory: the talkies were the worst thing to happen to cinema as an artform. Having started as moving pictures pure and simple, in thirty years it had developed to become an entirely new artform. FW Murnau (he of the 1922 Nosferatu) was a director who raised the silent film to peaks of artistic expression, and here is a pretty compelling slab of evidence in the form of his first big Hollywood movie.

Sunrise was released in the same year as The Jazz Singer, 1927, the year that effectively saw the talkies take over as the next stage of film technology. While I don’t buy this argument, there’s no question that the requirements of recording sound made the film a more stagey artform for a few years.

Murnau’s film starts out with a melodramatic plot, something out of a Victorian gothic novel. A man and a woman live with a maid » Continue Reading.

Year: 1978 Director: Charles Burnett

As there won’t be another Sight and Sound poll before 2032, there’s no need to rush through the top fifty finest films of all time. Yesterday’s watch, recommended by a friend’s son, was perhaps the most obscure film in the top 50: Killer of Sheep was certainly a new one to me.

The film’s genesis is pretty remarkable. It was made on weekends over four or five years with a largely non-professional cast. Writer and director Charles Burnett submitted it as his masters thesis – the cinematic equivalent of turning in OK Computer as a Music Tech MA graduation final project. Once finished it was acclaimed at the Berlin Film Festival but was unreleasable as Burnett had stuffed the soundtrack with greats from a century of jazz and soul, but neglected to secure the rights to any of the music. Eventually film curators cleaned up the print and sorted the rights. It’s hardly widely available still – your only – cough – legal option a pricy secondhand dvd. A quick google however will reveal numerous online options, the one we ended up watching had subtitles but was fine.

The film itself is in black » Continue Reading.

Year: 2024 Director: Alex Garland

This is an extremely well-made film that is also extremely annoying and frustrating. Its genesis appears clear enough: after the Trump assault on the capitol in 2021 zeitgeist-recycler Alex Garland clearly thought that there was a great idea for a movie. Fast forward three years and we have the first January 5th film, in cinemas before the end of the story is even known. We start with Nick Offerman as a President who has staged some kind of coup and is embattled in a civil war against the ‘Western Forces’ – ie California, and unlikely secessionist partner Texas.

Garland drops us into the middle of this conflict as feted war photographer Kirsten Dunst – none too subtley named Lee Miller, and her correspondent buddies resolve to go to Washington to interview the President before he’s exiled, executed or worse. Before they can get out of the hotel however a young apprentice female war photographer Cailee Spaeny who Lee saves in a bombing outrage, turns up to hitch a starry-eyed ride. I cannot tell you how personally annoying I found her character. Not only does she follow Lee around like a sad puppy, she’s a hipster » Continue Reading.

Year: 1959 Director: Francois Truffaut

After a bit of a hiatus I’ve dropped down the list a bit to the last one in the self-imposed limit of the top 50 in the Sight and Sound 2022 poll. I can’t believe in the previous decades this nouvelle vague classic was not much higher, and can only think that it’s critical fashion rather than anything intrinsic to the film that has caused it to lie in fiftieth place. A huge gap in my film education about to be filled as I’ve never seen it.

Francois Truffaut’s full feature debut, this plays almost like a first novel, in which ‘write about what you know’ rules. The episodic adventures and descent of Antoine closely parallel (we’re told) Truffaut’s own life. Far more interesting to me on first viewing is its clear role in the youthquake that was shaking up western culture as the wartime babies became teenagers. Antoine is a magnificent addition to the role call of angry young men (and they were almost all men) that were pushing aside their elders, sick and tired of the rigid society of the immediate post-war era. He’s been compared to Holden Caulfield, to James Dean in » Continue Reading.

Year: 2023 Director: Jonathan Glazer

When I went to see Schindler’s List in the nineties the couple next to me had brought popcorn and cokes, perhaps looking no further than the Spielberg name. Their refreshments remained untouched throughout the film. This I have always thought summed up the issues around Holocaust cinema very succintly.

I have to admit I thought at first I would not go and see Zone of Interest. Glazer can stand in for Spielberg: an auteur making his Holocaust movie on first take seems to lead more in the direction of Life Is Beautiful or The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas (both unwatched by me) than Shoah. Have we not had enough Holocaust films. There’s even a whole new genre of fiction ‘inspired by true stories’ such as The Tatooist of Auschwitz, The Tailor of Dachau concentration camp’ and so on.

And yet. Holocaust denial and anti-Semitism are on the rise. As it slips from living memory works of art that tell these stories will become more important, otherwise other stories contesting the magnitude, purpose or basic facts of the Holocaust will be unchallenged. However, if you enter this arena as a film-maker then the bar » Continue Reading.

Year: 1990 Director: Abbas Kiarostami

The seventeenth greatest film of all time, according to critics in the 2022 Sight and Sound poll, is not an easy film to see. Not on any streaming service (including the BFI Player) currently. The Criterion Collection edition is helpfully embedded on the wikipedia page for the film, so we watched that.

The con artist is an enduring film trope – what’s more natural to act out than a scene in which one person (at least) is already acting (‘lying for money’). From The Night of the Hunter, Hustle and The Grifters to Bowfinger (a film which bizarrely can be seen as kin to this masterpiece) film has been fascinated by er the grifter and the con artist.

Kiarastami’s starting point is a real story. A poor man struggling to feed his family, Hossain Sabzian, is sitting next to a well-dressed woman on a bus when she notices his book, a screenplay written by a famous Iranian film director, Mohsen Makhmalbaf. Quick as a flash he says he is Makhmalbaf and soon has an invitation to visit the woman’s family. Over the next few days he insinuates himself into her household, under the pretext of » Continue Reading.

Year: 1956 Director: John Ford

New Year – so rather than tackle anything new it’s another film from the Sight and Sound 2022 critics poll of the best films of all time. If Meshes of the Afternoon, a 15 min black and white silent short, was one of the most obscure then the film one spot above it in 15th place, The Searchers, is one of the most familiar. John Ford’s 1956 Western stands in that period where the genre was in transition, from the straightforward studio films with its reliable cast of heroes and villains to the cynical and nihilistic spaghetti westerns of the sixties.

John Wayne made a career playing the cowboy hero, and provides a magnetic central focus as an ex-confederate soldier who returns to the home of his brother. The opening action sees the menfolk lured away from the house by Native Americans, enabling another Comanche raiding party to loot, kill and most significantly kidnap Wayne’s two young nieces. Wayne and the adopted brother of the family Martin spend the entire rest of the film looking for these missing girls.

No need to rehash the plot further but instead talk about what Ford does in » Continue Reading.

Year: 2021 Director: Joel Coen

I’m having a bit of a Macbeth week and have watched two film versions.

First up I watched The Tragedy Of Macbeth directed by Joel Coen (2021). Loved it. To be honest, there are very few Shakespeare screen adaptations I don’t think are worth watching. He’s a decent writer, that Shakespeare chap, and his works translate to screen even better than stage, imho. (His prologue to Henry V calls the stage “an unworthy scaffold”. Well, I call big bucks screen adaptations “a worthy scaffold”.) I didn’t get into him via dull, reluctant reading-round-the-class at school or going to the theatre (as if!), but by watching the films. I like watching his plays performed with subtitles activated and sometimes with the original text to compare with. I’m not so keen on the “old school” screen adaptations, Olivier, Welles, Gielgud, Burton etc. The old black and whites. Funnily enough though, The Tragedy of Macbeth is in black and white, and boy is it beautiful to watch. The combination of lighting and shadows, the crisp clear cinematography and the austere, timeless sets (it was shot entirely on a soundstage) make it a visual treat. That’s its main » Continue Reading.

Year: 2023 Director: Yorgos Lanthimos

Part 1 – What it is

It is a stunning visual trip where almost every frame would be worthy of saving to keep on your wall, whether it is set in Victorian London, the slums of Alexandria or a Parisian whorehouse.

It is an astonishing, committed, all-in central performance by Emma Stone as Bella Baxter.

It is the story of Bella Baxter, the brain of an unborn child transplanted into the skull of her suicide mother by the brilliant, if mad, surgeon Godwin ‘God’ Baxter.

It is the story of Bella’s accelerated sexual, linguistic and intellectual development from baby to adult woman.

It is film which some will dismiss based on sexual themes played out by a character with the mind of an infant. ‘What a pretty little retard!’, says God’s student assistant McCandless on first meeting Bella, before falling in love with her.

It is a film which will strongly split opinions. After seeing the film I saw a screen grab of Google Reviews where about 45% gave the film 5*, 40% gave it 1* and the small remainder were evenly split among the middling scores. Both The Guardian and the Daily Mail gave » Continue Reading.

Year: 1943 Director: Maya Deren

If there’s a prize for least-seen film on the Sight and Sound 2022 poll then number 14 I am sure would be in with a shout. Meshes of the Afternoon is a 14-minute black and white silent film from 1943, made by avant-garde US/Ukrainian film-maker Maya Deren. Deren plays the protagonist, a young woman who returns home and sees a mysterious hooded figure. She falls asleep in a chair and in a series of dream-like replays of her return home a number of actions are repeated: she sees a mysterious hooded figure with a mirrored face. She opens the door with a key, and later on the key reappears from her mouth. She goes up a flight of stairs and lifts the needle from a record playing on a portable phonograph. There are telephones around the house off the hook and bread and a knife. Later on a doppelganger of her appears, and a man who she attempts to injure. In the final scenes she appears again in the chair now dead. If David Lynch had never made films perhaps this film would not have the current prominence it has, though clearly a film that » Continue Reading.