There has been lots of controversy recently about a statue of a 1970s entertainer erected outside a venue in Belfast. The statue was paid for and its erection in a public place lobbied for by an interest group – so, a case of local government listening to a groundswell of popular opinion and providing the location and authority for the thing to be erected, in perpetuity.
Controversy around the people depicted in statues tends to occur decades after the event, when attitudes to the individual or the values they represented change. In this instance, not many people (currently) seem to have a problem with the person depicted or their cultural contribution (though some online have grumbled about the geography/nationality aspect, spuriously reckoning that a Belfast-born rock musician ‘deserved’ the plinth instead).
Rather, the problem is with the quality of the depiction. I share that view. It’s rubbish. Proportions are wrong, facial resemblance is not there. (I’m not bothered about the brand of instrument depicted, which seems to appal many commentators – it’s based on a photo in which the instrument depicted is around the player’s neck. My only problem with it is that it’s proportionally wrong.)
This is, I’m » Continue Reading.