Six years after I lost the right, and became democratically disenfranchised, I can vote again in the country that issues my passport. Watch out, Priti Patel*!
Anyone else found themselves in a similar position? It’s a good thing, right?
* I bet she’s quaking in her stilettos
My assumption is, that along with the revision of constituency boundaries ‘to make populations more level’, it’s an attempt and under-the-radar gerrymandering my the sitting government. I know you visit the lovely Witham regularly to see family, Sal, but I can’t see why anyone who hasn’t set foot in the country for decades and has no intention of living under the control of its powers should get a say in its elections.
I’m not sure about gerrymandering, Gatz. My understanding is that a lot of pressure came from UK citizens resident in mainland Europe, particularly those prevented by the 15 year rule from voting in the 2016 referendum, even though they (we) were more affected and probably frequently more knowledgeable than many UK-based voters.
Rights of expats – It’s an interesting dilemma. Living outside the UK for pretty close on 20 years, do I have enough connection or any legitimate right to vote there? As you say, I do visit the UK several times a year. Is that enough?
Representation famously goes along with taxation. I may be unusual in that my ‘taxes’ are taken as an offset towards the contribution of the UK to the organization I work for. Post-Brexit, I don’t have any right to vote in Bonn, unless I take up German nationality. Where do my loyalties lie and what is my national identity? Forced to choose, I feel more British than German (though I would claim northern European if that were an option).
While I haven’t lived in the UK since 1981, I pay tax on income earned there and am presumably entitled to some say in how my contribution are spent. I certainly follow UK politics pretty avidly.
That said, I have not registered to vote since leaving and so the only votes I have ever cast were for Labour in the elections of Feb and October 1974.
My reasons for my non-voting are that because of the FPTP system, my vote has long been effectively null and void.
During the early years I was working overseas I was on the electoral role in a solidly Labour seat (my first MP was Richard Crossman, one of the Labour greats of the 50s and 60s). More recently, I could have registered to vote in Wokingham, just outside Reading, but didn’t bother because the sitting MP there is the odious John Redwood.
Having benefitted from freedom of movement, I would have voted Remain in 2016 and given what was at stake, I am gobsmacked by how many younger voters couldn’t be bothered.
@salwarpe if the AfD have their way, you might find yourself exercising your democratic rights back in Blighty…or are you embedded enough to keep them off your back?
I think, if the AFD have their way, all bets are off. The circumstances that would bring them to power are scary either way (electorally or non-electorally). I’m hoping that my host country has sufficiently learned from its own history to prevent that (re)occurring, though economic circumstance can lead to extremism, no matter the legal and moral constraints.
My residency permits arise from employment and marital status and time already spent here pre-Brexit, but both have expiry dates. Renewal is likely, but never certain. There may become a time when I have to bite the bullet and become a (U OK) Hun.
Ah, I’m a bit luckier than you – my permanent residency is in fact permanent, unless I get caught with my pants down in one or more entertaining ways.
I think I was being overly cautious – you just can’t tell for sure in these febrile times. I do have right of permanent residence, I will probably just have to get my permit cards renewed after 10 years.
Bloody hell, Germany is being taken over by the first Guns’n’Roses album? What a grim prospect!
What, worse than Chinese democracy?
Arf!
Actually maybe AFD were inspired by the lyrics of One in a Million…
Means I can vote again in UK. Never have though when living overseas. Why should I help to decide who makes up the government in a place I don’t live? I would have probably voted in the Brexit vote if I could have though
Can’t remember who the MP for South Norfolk is. Ah, Liz Truss.
@salwarpe
Given her absence of subtlety and style , PP is surely more of a DM than a stiletto kind of gal
@henpetsgi
Happily not for much longer
Last poll I saw was that despite everything Liz would still win. There is a saying in South Norfolk “Stick a blue rosette on a pig and watch it go to Westminster”. I’m certain if they had the chance they’d vote for Trump.
Some friends in a small village put a “No to Brexit” poster in their window. To this day very few people talk to them.
The logic goes, “I left the UK because it’s a shit-hole. And I intend to use my vote to make sure it stays that way”
PP is reputedly a dedicated constituency MP, frequently to be seen in the pages of the Brainless and WItless Times, gladhanding with all sorts of community groups. With a background in PR for big tobacco and the alcohol industry, I am sure she knows how to position herself for maximum benefit.
Given the cynicism of the Tories I assume they’ve done the maths and imagine the majority will be for them. Mine won’t, which will be very satisfying. Still, bit mad that I’ll have the vote in a place I haven’t lived for 20 years but don’t in the place where I’ve lived for those 20 years. However, v nice not to be completely disenfranchised for the first time since the Brexit vote.
FPTP suits Labour just as much as it does the Tories.
Ultimately, anyone who lives in a – for want of a better word – “hardcore”
Labour or Tory seat and doesn’t vote Labour or Tory is effectively
disenfranchised.
Absolutely – forty years of voting in the UK and not once did “my” guy win…
I have voted for the winning candidate in a General Election precisely once, in lancaster in 1997. I also moved that day and by the time the count was announced that evening I lived in Taunton. I can’t see me voting for a winning candidate again for as long as I live in Chelmsford where I am now.
FPTP suited Labour until the rise of the SNP in Westminster. Now that the spell appears to have been broken things might settle down a bit.
Given the disarray they are in, even the SNP’s offer of free deep-fried Mars bars for all doesn’t look as if it is going to stop Labour from clawing back a few of those seats.
The other reason why Lab and the Tories will resist moving away from FPTP to PR is the number of seats parties like UKIP/Reform will get.
With 600,000 votes they would have picked up quite a few in 2019
Flush ’em out and ridicule ’em, I say.
They and all 600,000 of their voters can go to hell; if you can’t have a sensible discussion with any of them without hearing garbled nonsense, what they read on socials and what that Tommy bloke said, they’ve lost any claim to democratic respect.
The party’ that is reform is a private limited company with charitable status. The name “The Reform Research Trust” was first registered with companies house on 4 March 2004 and as a charity on 13 May 2004. The trust is funded by large donations from businesses and smaller donations from individuals.
…with Nige as the majority shareholder…
Indeed.
If they ever won any elections, would the MP/Councillor be regarded as an employee, then?
In much the same way as Donald Trump and his acolytes are employees of the FSB, yes.
Whoever wins will get a majority with less than 50% of the vote. The biggest bloc of the electorate now is the non voters. In 2019, the Tories got 13.9M, 15.5M didn’t vote.
The GE statistic that floors me is the difference between the turnout between 2001 and 1997.
2001 was ten million lower.
Something to think about when we’re told about the resounding electoral success and popularity of the Labour government.
Blair’s great achievement was to inspire more Tory voters to stay at home than Labour voters.
Of course, proving voter ID for someone in another country is so much easier than an actual person stood in front of you in a village hall polling station.
In my case, NI number or passport is needed. But then I would be sent a postal vote to fill in and return, which theoretically anyone could intervene and do on my behalf.
Voter ID for in-person voting is far more my idea of vote-rigging.
The postal vote has to be signed before you send it in and the signature checked against an original signature.
I worked as election staff for a while and registered for a postal vote because I worked in a different constituency and therefore would have been unable to vote at home.
I’ve not changed back.
To be honest, although I would have loved to have a Brexit vote, as someone who for 20 years lives and pays taxes abroad, I’m not sure I have the “right” to “interfere” in UK politics.
Do you have a French passport, LoW?
No, just a 15 year resident’s visa. Can’t vote in French general elections just local which seems fair to me. We could apply for French Citizenship (several friends have successfully done so) but not sure we’re ready to go through the “In which year did Napoleon die” or “Sing the second verse of La Marseillaise” ordeal.
Don’t know about France, but can speak from personal experience of sorting out my wife citizenship here in Ireland. It was a lengthy process that involved having to jump through numerous hoops and pay a few thousand Euros for the privilege
The second verse?
Nothing you can make that can’t be made
(Love) No one you can save that can’t be saved
(Love) Nothing you can do, but you can learn how to be you in time
It’s easy
Try doing the Life in the UK test. I give this challenge to anybody on the Afterword. It’s a fkin ridiculous load of old cobblers. Making people do that is an insult to human dignity.
I like this one
What would Rishi say?
France seems to be a case of a simple fluency test (even simpler if you’re an OAP) , answer a list of “Life in France” questions (politics, history, how to cook beef bourguignon etc) then it’s eighty euros for your passport.
We’re just lazy immigrant freeloaders who apart from buying a house no Frenchman would ever buy, paying taxes, taking advantage of a world-class health service and drinking copious amounts of superb local wine, add nothing to the French economy.
“Simple fluency test” – which I assume you automatically fail if you have any trace of an English accent.
If I ever needed to, I would ensure I acquired my French citizenship by sticking a Galoises in my gob answering
every question with a Gallic shrug
As luck would have it, I am this very afternoon cooking a delish boeuf bourguignon. I’ve always used a recipe very much like that on the BBC Food website, and followed a similar method of preparation. But my method is very different from that given in Elizabeth Davids’s (English language) bible on these matter, French Provincial Cookery, wherein she issues various non-nons as regards my process. She does however also acknowledge, elsewhere in the tome, that there are as many recipes for boeuf bourguignon as there are French Provincial cooks, so how to prepare the dish (which is, after all, essentially just ‘beef with mushrooms and onions’ with a French name) might not really work as a nationality qualifier! And in any case, I make mine in a Dutch Oven.
Is a Dutch Oven one you go halves on with Mrs Foxy?
I’ve got ED’s French Prov book somewhere, with I think an upside down goose on the cover like the back of Mind Bomb without the bayonet.
Both that and ED’s Italian book are brilliant snapshots of an entire culture before it was steamrollered by McDonaldisation.
Rishi would say point one should read:
“Wearing a seatbelt while you sit in the back and your chauffeur drives the car”
Car? That’s a bit plebby. Is the helicopter being repaired?
He got charged and fined for not wearing a seatbelt in he back of his car when doing some kind of interview/photo ops
May have mentioned this before, but one Xmas I and my offspring and my Australian wife and her offspring all settled down to do the UK and Oz tests. (We know how to have fun in our family.) We all passed the Oz test and all failed the UK one. 🤪
I’ve been out of the UK for 30 years now and haven’t voted since I left. I had always taken the view that as I’m not resident, I should not influence the running of the country – although being from a safe labour seat in South Manchester (may not be the case now – haven’t checked) it wouldn’t have made a difference.
I was actually totally unaware of the 15 year rule until fairly recently (it may have been on here that I read it).
That said, with my elder son now at University in the UK and the younger one probably going this year, I could now argue that I now do have an interest…… may have to think about this.
It depends what you call south. By the time you get out to leafy Altrincham it goes from red to blue. This site is useful and easy to navigate https://maproom.net/demo/election-map/0.html
It was Manchester Withington
That Maproom UK constituencies map is pretty interesting. I didn’t know that there are currently 18 MPs who have lost their party’s whip due to various transgressions…
Only 18?
This has probably been the dirtiest parliament, in every sense, since the Georgian era.
You could argue you have an interest @Chrisf, in your head you may think so.
Do you honestly believe because you are taking advantage of the UK’s education system you have a say in how this country is run?
How much Council Tax I pay, Income Tax I pay, How the NHS is run, I think you get my drift. Yours thinking on this is selfish, ignorant and plain stupid.
@RayX
Might be a good idea if you took advantage of the 15-minute edit window and dialed back a bit on the aggression, R
Firstly, I am not taking advantage of the UK education system. Both of my sons are British citizens and so perfectly entitled to be educated in UK Universities (even though, as I have not been resident, I still have to pay ‘overseas rates’ – further showing I am not taking advantage).
Secondly, if you read my post, I have not voted since I left the UK as I don’t believe that I should. It is only the fact that both sons are potentially going to stay on the UK after University and hence likely that we will spend a significant proportion of the year living there – I think that is enough grounds to say I have an interest and is not being selfish, ignorant or plain stupid.
And given that many on this thread seem to be in favour, why is it only me that is selfish, ignorant or plain stupid ?
Is there a more self, ignorant and plain stupid statement in the English language than “I may have to think about this”? I think not.
We don’t take kindly to that kind of nakedly inflammatory chat round these parts.
Fairy nuff
@RayX The whole point of the forum is for discussion, but we draw the line at attacking individuals because of their points of view.
Please don’t allow your participation into threads to stray into that area
This ruling is a load of bollocks!
You choose to live abroad and there’s nothing wrong with that, you lose the right to vote in a constituency where you no longer live.
@salwarpe proclaims “It’s a good thing right”
No it’s FECKING NOT!
I think you missed the question mark out though which changes the meaning of @salwarpe ‘s statement.
No I did not Hubert, he is definitely celebrating this absurd rule, shame on him.
I can’t see anywhere he is celebrating this.
I am cavorting in the aisles, hubert. Those who wish to reverse it can campaign for the change. I think it is a good thing,
I’m cavorting too. That’s me waving behind you. 🕺🖐🥳
Thanks for clarifying Sal, I didn’t see any evidence of cavorting. We have a Skype this afternoon with a friend in Vienna I shall ask what she thinks.
Maybe it means nothing to her
It appears she is unable to as she left when the voting age was 21 in 1972 and therefore never registered to vote.
So it does mean nothing to her.
Oh.
I thought the voting age was lowered to 18 before the 1970 election (itself a fairly self-interested move by the Wilson administration, albeit one that backfired)
You are correct, when next we speak I’ll bring it up.
I could first vote in 73 so I’d confused it with my first vote.
As you have the decency to discourse in a civilised manner, I expect you’ll get an answer you are happy to engage with.
This is more of a grey area than I assumed, when first hearing of this change.
My immediate reaction was outrage at what I perceived to be a bit of gerrymandering to bolster the chances of the Tories in the forthcoming General Election. I’m pretty sure that’s why they’ve decided to do it at this juncture, but the change does have merit in ways I’d not previously considered, so I suppose I’ll have to support it for Parliamentary elections, which can effect legislation on tax liability. Subject to registration of the fact that you have UK tax liability.
People living outside the UK who still have UK tax liability should have a say in how much tax they pay and what it’s used for. No taxation without representation is a fundamental principle. My landlady, for instance, has lived in Spain for some years but owns property here, which presumably makes her liable for taxation on her rental income.
Incidentally, those expats here wishing they could have had a vote in the Brexit Referendum and perhaps stopped our leaving the EU should bear in mind that among those non-residents who did get to vote in 2016, there were a not-inconsiderable proportion who voted, even against their own interests, to leave the EU. There would certainly have been a similar proportion among those who were denied a vote back then.
My views are unchanged.
If you live abroad you should not be able to have a say in another country’s democratic processes.
What next? You want to vote in another nations elections because you went there for a holiday. Daft idea isn’t it? Not as daft as this latest Tory shenanigans.
VOTE OFF!
Vote off what, exactly?
Is it like AW BakeOff, and one of us has to leave every week?
For many years after moving abroad I had absolutely no interest in voting in UK elections and, rightly or wrongly, justified this position to myself and anyone who asked by disclaiming that “I don’t live there anymore and therefore feel I have no real right to vote”. When I reached the 15 year limit, I just thought “so what”.
Around 2014 however, over dinner one evening, a friend with a very senior position in the EU parliament asked whether I thought there was a chance the British might actually vote to leave the EU. I realised at that moment that I had never seriously considered this before. Eventually I said “yes, I think it is perfectly possible they might”. If I surprised myself with this realisation, it’s fair to say everybody else at the table was shocked. This was so unfathomable to their liberal, european way of thinking that I think they started to doubted my insider insight into the collective british mind.
And although I still thought it wouldn’t happen, it made me realise that I had a dog in the fight, but no stick to poke it with.
We’re all familiar with what happened next.
Now I find myself again in a similar situation. Since Tuesday I’ve been able to reapply for my voting rights, but where? The last place I lived in London; where I studied; where I was brought up? It all seems so inappropriate and random. “Oh, who needs it” I thought. Yet realistically this country is still able to make decisions that influence my life and the lives of my children, even though I now possess dual citizenship. I guess I’m going to have to bite the bullet and sign on the dotted line, just in case.
Do you get a free choice of anywhere you were ever on the electoral register while resident?
From a short reading of the FAQs,
Q. I left the UK in 1995 and I lived at several addresses – Barnsley, Birmingham and Blackpool – before I emigrated. Can I register at any one of them?
A. You can register either in the last place you were registered to vote or in your last place of residence before you emigrated. You will need to provide evidence to support this in your application. Constituency shopping won’t be allowed.
Basically, I agree with what Gatz wrote at the beginning of this thread. I’ve lived in Sweden for many years and pay no UK tax and this should not have a vote in the general elections.
But I’m very interested to read about other people’s situations and opinions. There many different factors at play.
And surely the whole point of this forum is to be able to throw out ideas and not be jumped upon?
Incidentally, I do think that British citizens living abroad ought to have had a vote in the Brexit referendum as it had such a drastic effect on our lives.
I’ve been abroad since 2002.
I have family in the UK still, and some small pension funds. I will – hopefully in quite a few years – get some kind of inheritance when my parents carc.
Should I vote? Probably not. My last constituency was a “weigh the vote” Tory stronghold, so my vote would largely be wasted. I live in one country and already vote in another. Feels a little like spreading my democratic choices a little thin.
Unfortunately, I think the Government has painted what could be a nuanced picture with a thick brush stroke.
Thick is the only language this government understands
As a general principle, I am not uncomfortable with UK Passport holders voting in UK elections.
I suppose, if you removed that right based on where someone lives, you’d have to allow non UK passport holders who are living in the UK to vote. And that would be quite difficult to manage and, I would think, quite difficult for some people to consider – foreigners voting in our election.
You have to pick a principle and stick with it I suspect.
Irish passport holders resident in the UK can vote, I believe.
All principles can have longstanding and sensible exceptions when merited.
I looked that up and it would seem to be true – from this government document. It quotes Clement Atlee:
“As everybody knows, there are in Britain large numbers of people of Irish
descent, some born in Eire and some born in this country, and there is a
continual passage to and for of people who come over to work or to study or
for pleasure. It would be an extremely difficult thing to decide in every case
from day to day as to what the exact status was of a person with an Irish
name, and if we had had to attempt to make all citizens of Eire aliens, it would
have involved a great expenditure of men and money and a great extension of
the control of aliens. …
We therefore came to the conclusion that we should reciprocally decide that
the people of Eire and the people of Britain should not be foreign to one
another… I do not pretend that the solution at which we arrived is completely
logical – very few things in the relationship between these islands have been
completely logical – but I believe they are practical and I believe that they are
to our mutual benefit”.
So, a messy compromise.
Ireland, despite its large diaspora, does not give voting rights to its own citizens abroad. Back in 2007, David McWilliams, economist and podcaster saw this as a mistake, as it loses out on the perspective and involvement of a large part of its citizenry. The world is interconnected whatever Brexiters and little Englanders might think.
The connection between the citizens of a country living abroad and their homeland is, in my view, strengthened, by giving them suffrage.
Practical and of mutual benefit. That sounds like a very sensible baseline for government policy.
…and The Days of Pearly Spencer was a CHOON.
It’s not just Brexiters or Little Englanders. Scots living in the rest of the UK ( or elsewhere) didn’t get to vote in the independence referendum. And Little Scotlanders weren’t keen on extending the franchise for any Indy2 when the possibility was floated a couple of years back.
Incidentally, British expats had no vote at all until the Tories changed the law in the 1980s.
Interesting points, particularly about the law change in the 1980s, thanks!
Kinnell, I didn’t know that about the Scottish referendum. Whit a scunner.
I am now a Canadian citizen so can vote in all elections, local, provincial and federal. A friend has been here longer than me but remains UK passport holder only (he would prefer a Welsh one) and has permanent resident status here. I think he should be allowed to vote if he wants to. He can’t currently vote in any elections anywhere (until this change)
If your friend was able to successfully apply for and obtain a Welsh passport, where might he go to seek assistance when he found himself in some sort of trouble overseas?
The Welsh consulate? 😉 That part was more of a joke. Funnily enough on some government forms here that ask your nationality Welsh is sometimes given as an option alongside British, Scottish too I suppose
I always have a little grumble to myself that I can’t put Cornish
Mebyon Kernow!
Should such a thing ever come into being, a Welsh consulate could surely not be any worse than its British counterpart.
When I lived in Jeddah in the early 80s, a mate got done for boozing and was offered a choice of three months in clink or 30 lashes in public before he was dragged on to a plane and deported.
Since the official meting out the lashes has to hold a bulky ceremonial Quran under his arm while doing so, taking the lashes seemed like something a no brainer.
Not to the junior official the Brit Embassy in Jeddah*.
Conscious of the bad publicity garnered by UK red tops’ hysterical coverage of “barbaric floggings”, the wet-behind-the-ears diplomat recommended my mate do his porridge.
The choice of words with which my mate sent the man back to the Embassy was far from diplomatic
* At that time, the only Brit Embassy whose office wasn’t located in a capital city
Your mate took a public flogging in 80s Saudi Arabia? Blimey.
That’s certainly a great ice breaker at work events.
Lashings were more about public humiliation than punishment (having been able to look inside the jail – two aircons between 50 people – where they incarcerated expats, I’d have gone for the lashes as well. The poor Indians, Pakistanis, Koreans, Filipinos and Yemenis who got banged up had it a million times worse).
As mentioned above, the amount of welly with which a lasher can dispense each stroke is seriously limited by the hefty ceremonial Quran he has to hold under his right arm (always the right arm in Arab countries) while doing so.
To be honest, it’s more the public humiliation bit I was trying to wrap my head around. I can’t really imagine visiting a foreign country and ending up being flogged in public (even lightly). What do you do after it’s over? Whack the shirt back on and go for dinner?
You get taken to the airport and put on the next plane home
Just having to take my shirt off would be bad enough for me. And everyone else.
Although it’s probably water off a ducks back for anyone who has stagnighted in Amsterdam.
I’m totally happy with UK citizens based abroad being given a vote, on the strict proviso that they spare us the tedious “obviously it’s all gone downhill since I left” subtext chat (regardless of whether or not it happens to be true). They should also be forced to dress as Beefeaters on election day.
What if they are vegetarian?
They can dress as Leafeaters. Fair’s fair.
Following the wonky logic of some people in this thread, If Brits abroad who pay no UK taxes shouldn’t be entitled to vote in UK elections, then presumably all foreign nationals who are currently working in the UK, even if only temporarily, should be entitled to vote provided they pay the corresponding UK taxes, NI, etc.
“No taxation without representation” must also mean “if taxation, then representation.” But obviously it doesn’t. I’ve been tax-resident in Spain for 35 years. I’m not allowed to vote in general elections here simply because I’m not a Spanish citizen.
This isn’t hard. In practically all Western countries, including the UK and the EU member states, it’s citizenship, not tax residency, that determines who has the right to vote in general elections.The 15-year rule that’s just been scrapped was an unjustifiable anomaly, inasmuch as it left me and many thousands of other British citizens globally disenfranchised for several years.
Given the regularity with which these excitable Johnny Foreigner types in the Iberian peninsula decide to change government, you’re probably better off not having a vote
Citizenship plus taxpayer status is what I favour, not taxpayer status alone. I don’t see why retained citizenship alone should entitle you to vote in UK parliamentary elections if your stake in the UK is minimal at best.
What about those who work for international institutions of which the UK is (still) a member?
Where does that stop? the UN? NATO? … U.N.C.L.E?
T.H.R.U.S.H. ?
I’ve heard THRUSH can be very painful for members. Not something to enter lightly.
Y.O.G.H.U.R.T.
Y.O.U. D.O. K.N.O.W. T.H.A.T. P.U.T.T.I.N.G. A. W.O.R.D. I.N. C.A.P.I.T.A.L.S. S.E.P.A.R.A.T.E.D. B.Y. F.U.L.L. S.T.O.P.S. D.O.E.S.N.’.T. M.A.K.E. I.T. A.N. I.N.T.E.R.N.A.T.I.O.N.A.L. O.R.G.A.N.I.Z.A.T.I.O.N. , D.O.N.’.T. Y.O.U?
Astonshing long acronym.
Tsk. That’s abbreviation, not acronym.
Abbreviation but at the moment I’m trying to make it into an acronym.
I’ve not got very far.
Don’t take too long, Hubes. It’ll be an anacronym.
So anybody who is a citizen of one country but lives, works and pays taxes in another will always be unable to vote in either?
Tough crowd.
That’s a very good point, Archie.
I suspect that there many people throughout the world who live and work in country where they have no vote.
Switzerland, for example, was notorious for never allowing guest workers who had been on the Swiss labour force for many years, to stay in the country long enough to achieve residence status and the vote. They were kicked out of the country for a few months every year to prevent them from qualifying!
Not having the vote was certainly the case for me for years in Sweden until I finally applied for Swedish nationality.
And of course the fifteen year ruling meant that I was disenfranchised in the UK.
That didn’t bother me too much as I had no plans to return and it didn’t feel right to vote in a country where I no longer lived.
Sweden allows dual nationality. Many countries don’t. And renouncing one’s citizenship is not something one does lightly.
As this Wikipedia article shows, citizenship and dual citizenship are very complicated issues,
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_citizenship
Some countries are more generous than others, as regards entitlement to citizenship. If, for example, you happen to be born on a plane which is flying over US airspace you are, I believe, entitled to US citizenship.
And if you are born on a Ryan Air flight anywhere in the world, I believe the benefits are extremely generous.
Back to Archie’s situation. Logically you might think that if a person has been living and paying tax in a country for many years, they ought to be entitled to a vote in the general election. Nope! That’s not how it works, as far as I know.
Are there any countries where this is the case?
Maybe a few banana republics or tax havens?
You would be amazed at how restrictive most countries are about enfranchising non-natives!
Once again, the USA goes its own way. You can buy a raffle ticket, and if you are lucky, you can win a Green Card.
Hilarious! The Swedish Board of Immigration would go ballistic if anyone proposed that here.
@Kaisfatdad
In Switzerland there can be generations of e.g. Italians who never became Swiss. Born there, speak the lingo, have permanent residence but can’t vote (or do jury duty).
I have met Irish people in New York (normally working in bars), with strong Irish accents, but they are US citizens as their mother came to the US for their birth, staying with close or distant relatives and paying for the privilege of using the local hospital.
Thanks @Dai. Two countries there with widely different approaches. I suspect that even if one of those Italians gave birth in Switzerland the child would not be entitled to Swiss nationality.
There is a lot of “birth tourism” to the USA.
“Each year, the United States become birthplace of 33,000 babies while their mothers visit the country as tourists — on top of hundreds of thousands more born by women on temporary visas and illegal aliens.”
This site describes the legal issues:
https://www.lawsb.com/giving-birth-in-usa-on-tourist-visa/
The wikipedia page on birth tourism is worth a look.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Birth_tourism
“No European country presently grants unconditional birthright citizenship except Finland; however, most countries in the Americas, e.g., the United States, Canada, Mexico, Argentina, and Brazil do so. In Africa, Chad, Lesotho and Tanzania grant unconditional birthright citizenship,[citation needed] as do some in the Asian-Pacific region including Fiji, Pakistan, and Tuvalu.[”
Finland! That was surprising.
Yes, that was the point, Being born there gives you no rights. And women only got the vote in Switzerland in 1972 or something!
The Swiss are something else! Here’s Wiki:
“In Switzerland, women’s suffrage was introduced at the federal level, by a nationwide (male) referendum in 1971, but the referendum did not give women the right to vote at the local Cantonal level. The Cantons independently voted to grant women the right to vote. The first Canton to give women the right to vote was Vaud in 1959. The last Canton, Appenzell Innerrhoden, had a centuries-old law forbidding women to vote. This was only changed in 1990 when Switzerland’s Federal Court ordered the Canton to grant women the right to vote.”
Canton Appenzell Innerrhoden! What a bunch of reactionaries. The Federal Court had to intervene to ensure women got the vote in local elections!
Here’s top notch article about women’s suffrage around the world.
https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/10/05/key-facts-about-womens-suffrage-around-the-world-a-century-after-u-s-ratified-19th-amendment/
“In Saudi Arabia, women were enfranchised in local elections in 2015; the country does not hold national elections. “
In Appenzell they still used to vote by raising hands in the town square, not sure that is still the case. Amazing cheese though!
Indeed they still do, women however have only been allowed to vote in it since 1991 as KFD has noted above.
https://www.swissinfo.ch/eng/politics/a-visit-to-appenzell-inner-rhodes–the-last-canton-to-grant-women-the-right-to-vote-in-switzerland-/46328984
Despite the gender imbalance, they have however held referenda on single issues with local importance for a long time – for example, while I was working there in the late ’70s they held one in Valais regarding the canton’s responsibility for supplying free milk to school children. So on a local front, you could argue that there was in fact more democracy in action en Suisse than in many other western european countries.
I’m not a citizen of NZ, I’m a Permanent Resident. That process was pretty straightforward really and I have voted in many NZ elections – so that’s the opposite of what you are saying, KFD. Unless you are calling NZ a banana republic or a tax haven…(no and hell, no).
I am considering voting in the next UK GE because what happens there affects my family and friends. It is vital to dismiss the current Government.
Almost the first thing Mrs thep did when she arrived in UK on a spouse visa in 2010 was vote in a GE. I’ve always blamed her for the subsequent 14-year shitshow.
It was very interesting to read your comment about how your status as a Permanent Resident in NZ entitles you to vote, @Black Celebration.
It sounds far more generous than most countries. Then again, NZ was the first country in the world with universal suffrage. So maybe they
are more forward- thinking?
This explains more about who is eligible to vote:
https://vote.nz/enrolling/get-ready-to-enrol/are-you-eligible-to-enrol-and-vote/
“You’re eligible to enrol and vote if you are 18 years or older, a New Zealand citizen or permanent resident, and you’ve lived in New Zealand continuously for 12 months or more at some time in your life.
For electoral purposes, you are a permanent resident if you’re in New Zealand legally and not required to leave within a specific time.”
NZ also seems to be more flexible as regards homeless people.
“If you are homeless, you can enrol at the address where you spend a substantial part of your time. You can also enrol at the last residential address where you lived for at least 1 month, even if that was some time ago.
When you enrol to vote, you’ll need to provide a postal address where electoral mail, such as enrolment confirmations, can be sent. The postal address could be a PO Box, or the address of a friend, family member, church or support group, but it needs to be someone who will agree to hold your mail for you to collect.”
Correct me if I am wrong, but in the UK doesn’t a would-be voter normally have to be on the electoral register in a specific constituency. Or is there a loophole that allows people without a permanent adress the right to vote?
I with some friends this evening who back in the 90s lived on a boat and couldn’t vote. It appears you can.
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/register-to-vote-if-you-havent-got-a-fixed-or-permanent-address
@hubert-rawlinson
There’s nothing a political party of any stripe
hates and fears more than a floating voter
Hats off @jaygee
👏 👏 👏
Well, Jaygee wins the white carnation…
We can’t have taxation without representation. We can’t afford the tea.
Time to wake up and smell the coffee.
Can anyone else smell tinned chicken?
That’s all they sell in the ‘English’ shops here in Germany. That will all change now the shopkeepers can vote back home.
incidentally – it says something (though I don’t know what) that I write a 1500 word carefully-researched and annotated post about a current singer and get 4 comments, but throw out a few words that some find controversial at 4am, and the comments keep on flowing.
German shopkeepers? So Turkey, then. I thought Erdogan relies on the fact they can.
@hubert-rawlinson
Looks like the wonderful folks over at Corsair
have taken the words “lean cuisine” a tad too literally
Those tins of chicken were popular in the former Soviet Union due to having western music like Elton John and Cliff Richard etched into them – and played in a wax cylinder style.
It’s so funny how we don’t squawk any more
So that’s why you’re spitting feathers
My 2d worth: I have permanent residency in Oz but no voting rights – probably a good thing since I have completely failed to get my head round the Oz electoral system. FPTP it ain’t.
My only passport is British. All the tax I pay, which isn’t much, I pay in the UK (including council tax). Because of 14 years of accumulated rage and disgust I will definitely vote in the next GE, whether or not I’m there, even though it may be pointless in my constituency. Postal voting is too unreliable at this distance, so I’ll ask my lovely UK neighbour to be my proxy.
Sorry to sound like our many-headed angry friend, but if people disapprove, tough.
Even though I haven’t paid any taxes in the UK for 35 years, I did invest money in the British state throughout my twenties by paying in all my NI contributions. I’ll soon be entitled to recover some of that investment in the form a small pension when I retire, so the pensions policy that will be followed by any new government is very much a matter I think I’m entitled to have a say in.
Nurse!
Something I am following with great interest. Have you topped up your NI contributions for missing years? You can fill her boots until April 2025. I am waiting 5o hear how much I need to contribute for each missing year, hope is I can get close to a full UK pension
*waiting to hear (of course)
No, I’m not bothering topping up in the UK, because Spanish pensions are much more generous than UK ones (a full one here is about 85% of your average salary over the last 15 years). Instead, I’m having my UK years added to my Spanish years. The total will then be divided proportionally between the two systems, and each will pay me the corresponding proportion of their respective full pension. Er, if that makes sense (I’m not sure even I understand it fully).
OK, my state pension portion is going to be made up of bits of Swiss (good), Canada (similar to UK) and the UK one, I need as much as I can get.
I carried on paying NI until I was made redundant a couple of years ago, when I was way past pensionable age, obvs. So I get the full pension, which is nice. Something else that’s nice is the reciprocal arrangement between the NHS and Medicare here, which means that any state-funded stuff, eg doc appts, x-rays etc, are either free or subject to a chunky rebate.
I have 2 passport dual nationality. I lived more than 50 years in the UK. I didn’t have much luck getting my choice of candidate elected apart from in Croydon in 97 when the seat turned Labour. That was joyous. I have a UK proxy but Wantage will always be Tory so why bother. I feel dual and I have the right so I go both ways. Sweden is proportional rep so you get several choices. Nice to try both systems.
The wikipedia article on universal suffrage is an interesting read, particularly the country by country overview.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_suffrage#:~:text=Universal%20suffrage%20(or%20franchise)%20ensures,person%2C%20one%20vote%22%20principle.
New Zealand was the first country in the word with universal suffrage. (Finland was second.)
“With the extension of voting rights to women in 1893, the self-governing British colony became one of the first permanently constituted jurisdictions in the world to grant universal adult suffrage,[30] suffrage previously having been universal for Māori men over 21 from 1867, and for white men from 1879.[79] Plural voting (impacting men) was abolished in 1889. Some adult prison inmates are denied the right to vote.”
I am glad to get my vote back although I will probably rely on a proxy rather than trust a postal vote from Japan ( where I have no vote at all, but then the LDP win everything anyway). I am aware that reactions to the law cut across party lines and some left wingers I know are unhappy about this, and concede that FPTP is not ideal for remote voting, but I consider suffrage a measure of modern citizenship.
A word of warning to people based overseas looking for advice on UK pensions. Avoid those companies who promise to look into this stuff for “free”. They will be looking to “unlock” your UK pension and transfer it to a shit, high cost investment product and will be paid a hefty chunk of the transfer in commission. They don’t seriously check whether it’s in your best interests to transfer. Worse than that, if it turns out doing that was a bad thing, your non-UK adviser will run a mile and there’s not a lot you can do about it.
Get info from Govt websites or media articles. Or go through a financial adviser that is regulated by UK financial advice legislation.
Why is this an issue? Well…people who are in state-backed occupational pension schemes like the Civil Service, the NHS or the Police generally have a very good pension. Particularly if the service is long and they first started their career pre-80s. These pension schemes are enormously resilient and have inbuilt government-backed guarantees. If you transfer to an investment product in NZ (say) you are now hoping it’s going to be OK. If that provider goes under, then so do you.
I became a pensioner about a year ago and before the Swedish Pension Service decided how much I would be payed I had a long phone interview with a lady who worked there who went through my entire working life with me.
Even though I first left the UK at the age of 28 or so to work for a Danish travel company, Tjaereborg, she was convinced I would have the right to a certain UK pension. And got my permission to write to the UK Pensions Authority on my behalf.
She was right, bless her! I now receive 300 pounds a month from the UK. And that makes quite a difference. I could buy the latest Joni Mitchell deluxe boxset or some Dick’s Picks,.
Mrs KFD is so boring! She insists that I use it to buy food for the family rather than that exclusive De Luxe Gold Plated Re-issue of Trout Mask Replica!
You should hold out on that gold-plated reissue.
There’s a diamond-studded one coming next year.
With a live trout and instructions to make your own mask.
I knew that I could rely on you for jazz recommendations @Mike_H. I now realise that you are also an expert on all matters Beafheartian. So next time I want to splash out on some arcane Troutmask rarities, you’ll be the one I consult!
I suspect that there are all manner of esoteric, exotic treats out there just waiting to be discovered. Zoothorn Rollo, the Mascara Snake, Winged Eel Fingerling, Rockette Morton and Drumbo have not been forgotten.
Hmm. I am not sure that my son and his friends will be thrilled at the prospect of tens of thousands of expat pensioners voting for whoever promises to maintain the Triple Lock.
Although the image I often have of the retired Costa Del Sol-dwelling, red-faced/leather-skinned, Daily Mail-reading expat seems quite prevalent in the popular imagination, of the (gov. stats) estimated 3.5 million UK citizens abroad eligible to vote, a 2015 survey available from the OECD would suggest only 23% of that total are 55+ years old.
The most popular destination country appears to be Australia. I wonder what proportion of them are disgruntled medics?
But isn’t the Triple Lock inapplicable to the majority of expat pensioners?
Don’t a lot of them who retired abroad still only get whatever the pension rate was when they left the UK. With no parity with current rates unless their host country has a reciprocal arrangement with the UK?
ISTR a discussion on this in a much earlier AW thread.
The UK pension is one of the most miserly in Europe.
While I doubt the leathery faced expats in the Costa del Crime need the £780 or so a month the govt doles out,
there are loads of OAPs in the UK who have nothing else to get by on.
They not only need the protection that Triple Lock offers them but thoroughly deserve it.
That said, with ‘baby boomers’ now reaching or having passed retirement age, the time is coming
when the UK and any other country offering a state pension is going to face huge problems in
finding the funds to bankroll it
Well there’s a surprise…
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2024/jan/22/tories-hire-coordinator-to-get-expat-supporters-to-vote-in-general-election?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
Suddenly I feel that I ought to vote after all, @mikethep.
It could be payback time for all those overseas Brits who did not get the possibility to vote against Brexit.
Yes, that’s another good reason KFD.