I’ve been musing on how many bands frittered their early promise by becoming more bloated as a live entity as time went by. Take most guitars/bass/drums outfit, and by the time they’re on their third album, their live presence has incorporated a keyboard player, an extra guitarist, backing singers… you name it.
Take Guns’n’Roses. Whether you like their music or not, it’s fairly undeniable that their early impact was due to their uncompromising, punky take on hard rock. Two guitars, bass, drums and a singer with a (ahem) unique delievery. By the time they’d put out TWO sprawling albums on the same day in 1992, they were touring with a keyboard player, backing singers and a four-piece horn section. Fleetwood Mac (Rumours and onward) toured with five members in 1977. When I saw them they had an extra keyboard player, an extra guitarist and three backing singers. Ditto the Eagles. Did it make life easier for the main men and women? Of course. Did it make them sound any better? That’s debatable.
Some acts play with a USP of their lineup, eg current media pincushions Royal Blood. Some clearly have a bit of ‘help’ from backing tracks or triggered samples » Continue Reading.