Can anyone shed any light on the logic behind Apple’s pricing structure hopefully highlighted in the attached pic? Beyond me, I can tell you.
https://www.flickr.com/gp/150522845@N04/nw64v4
Musings on the byways of popular culture
Can anyone shed any light on the logic behind Apple’s pricing structure hopefully highlighted in the attached pic? Beyond me, I can tell you.
https://www.flickr.com/gp/150522845@N04/nw64v4
I listened to my ‘The Rush Remasters’ copy of 2112 this week, and blow me down if the whole of side 1 – the 2112 side – hasn’t been remastered as one 20-minute track. Now when I bought the vinyl back in the day there were 7 distinct tracks on side one with proper gaps in between. Why on earth would they now say that the listener must experience our progerpiece as one magnum opus? Plays havoc with any playlisting I might want to do that might, for example, use The Temples of Syrinx and not the rest. The only other album I have ever come across that does this is a Laurent Garnier Mixmag Live CD that in the height of ‘DJs as artists’ nonsense made his mix one 79 minute track. Thanks Laurent – we love your ‘journey’ but you know if say you want to pick up where you left off half-way through that’s really irritating. Ironic really from the then proponents of libertarianism that they impose a strict listening order on their own album. So any other examples of ruthless enforcement of listening order via this practice?