I was gifted a subscription to Private Eye for Christmas and am thoroughly enjoying its exposure of the pomposity and corruption seemingly endemic in the world’s ruling classes, as well as the cartoons of course. However, one regular feature has me baffled. I’m sure the massive includes many Eye readers, so can anyone answer me this: why do they always refer to King Charles as Brian? Is this a recent occurrence or does it go back to when he was plain old Prince of Wales? I’m probably missing something obvious, but I can’t see any connection between him and Life of Brian or Brian Clough (any other famous Brians?). Any ideas, readers?
A very Afterword Exchange?
Spotted in the ‘From The Message Boards’ item in a recent Private Eye. I am sure this will give many of you something to smile about this fine autumn morning. It references a “new’ book, ‘Dull Men of Great Britain’.
‘As a serious record collector I collect mint vinyl (stored in optimal conditions which I have described before) and don’t own any form of gramophone (records are not for “playing”: styli damage grooves and turntable heat causes warping). The only non-mint discs I possess are valuable mis-pressings and mis-labelings: the Holy Grail of record collecting – nay, ALL collecting. Hence no such serious collectors appear in this rather silly book. – PCS 3042
If you don’t play them, how do you know they are mis-pressed and mis-labeled? – Jon
i got some record’s that are even more rarer i got a copy of the beatels sergeant pepper in the sleeve of dawns greatest hits and a copy of disc one of elvis 40 greatest hits in the sleeve of cherish by david cassidy i got them at car boots for 50p each but they must be worth a fortune – Record Fan
Those are neither rare, nor collectable or valuable » Continue Reading.
