Yes, I love that one. And Missionary Man. I feel like I should go back and listen to the albums again. Oh yes, Beethoven (or whatever it’s called) is amazing as well. Completely bonkers.
Newark’s out Missionary Man as my example. Horrendous!
For me they were peerless doing the electronic stuff and then just turned into any average over produced 80s rock band (with a great singer) when they decided to “rock out”
Let’s face it, when it comes to white Americans attempting to play reggae, one probably doesn’t need all the fingers of a single hand to count the ones doing it right.
Surprising, since the ska, rock steady and reggae rhythms were all derived from New Orleans R&B originally.
Wasn’t reggae primarily derived from the Jamaican mento, a rhythm brought over from West Africa? That’s what I’ve always believed. Maybe I’m wrong, I don’t know.
“The music that the first sound systems played would include some mento records, and they would also play a fair number of latin-flavoured records. But the bulk of what they played was music for dancing, imported from America, made by Black American musicians, many of them the same musicians we looked at in the early months of this podcast. Louis Jordan was a big favourite, as was Wynonie Harris — the biggest hit in the early years of the sound systems was Harris’ “Bloodshot Eyes”. ..
The other artists who get repeatedly named in the histories of the early sound systems along with Jordan and Harris are Fats Domino, Lloyd Price, Professor Longhair — a musician we’ve not talked about in the podcast, but who made New Orleans R&B music in the same style as Domino and Price, and for slow-dancing the Moonglows and Jesse Belvin. They would also play jazz — Dizzy Gillespie, Duke Ellington, and Sarah Vaughan were particular favourites.”
It’s a grower. And what I like specifically about it is that it couldn’t possibly have been made by anyone other than Morrissey. Flawed at times without a doubt, incorrigible and almost indefensible on occasions too. But always witty, original and surprising. For me modern pop or rock is wearingly bland relieved only by unusual and striking blasts like this. And it isn’t even close to being one of his best.
I have just spent time with an old friend in Florida. Ordinarily his musical taste is in sync with mine.
However he has a whole collection of Christmas albums by his favourite artists.
There isn’t a good one.
For me my rule of thumb is that anything with a linn drum or a slap bass is a pile of shit.
Rapture is a fantastic song, and Debbie’s rapping is fine. She and Chris Stein were culture vultures that were genuinely plugged into the emerging hip hop scene, unlike Malcom McLaren.
Impeccable. Took the family to a screening of the Snowman & The Snowdog at the Union Chapel with an orchestra a fair few Christmases ago and the second half of the show was basically Smith & Burrows playing the most christmassy cuts from the album. With added Tim Wheeler at some points as well. Simply the best Christmas thing I have ever done.
Bloody hell, that sounds like one of the greatest gigs ever staged.
The Snowman & Snowdog soundtrack is legitimately one of the best records of the last decade, and When The Thames Froze is among the most evocative Christmas songs ever written.
IMO you’re all missing the point – the only good Christmas music is the cheesy, bad kind of Christmas music! Don’t play “good” or “tasteful” Christmas music in my presence, please.
I love the novelty hits and the unlikely cover versions; that’s the true Christmas spirit to me!
I try a new Christmas album every year, and I choose them from two categories: either original songs by a band/artist in a genre that isn’t known for its Christmas songs, or well-known chestnuts sung by an artist that is an unlikely candidate for singing these.
The ones I end up disliking are the dull and too tasteful ones, the ones I play again next year are the wonderfully “bad” ones. But that’s just me, I guess!
1. The record of carols sung by the Kings College choir which my parents used to play when I was a kid and has long since been lost. Yes there are a million newer ones but they’re not the same.
2. The Phil Spector Christmas album.
Applaud and enjoy any album where, when promoting it, the band say they made it for themselves first and foremost and if anyone else doesn’t like it then they can fuck right off.
Most people regard his imperial phase as up to Scary Monsters. In the eighties, he made his money, having been ripped off by previous management. By Black Tie White Noise, he was in his mid forties and no longer a trend setter for the youth, but a comfortably rich middle aged man. That album was a celebration of his wedding a reflection on his life. He no longer had street free and stopped adopting different personas.
The post Tin Machine albums are packed with great tunes, not just one or two. Some are more experimental than others. Some work better than others. This is true of his imperial phase, too. I regard Hours as one his most personal, Heathen as a mature classic and Buddha Of Suburbia as an engrossing left field odd ball. The only post 1990 album I revisit infrequently is Earthling.
Digression, I confess, but here is a useful rule of thumb while holidaying in Scotland.
Never go to hostelry with a big red T outside. They are invariably the roughest joint in town.
Sabbath with RJD were effectively a different band and worked best when they operated as such. The live performances when they reformed as Heaven & Hell and played only RJD era songs were very good. Live Evil, which has Ronnie singing both his own and Ozzy songs, is not.
I’ll have to give Live Evil a go sometime. I love the two RJD Sabbath albums….much more than any of the Ozzy albums which I know will cause me to burn in hell.
I think RJD had the finest set of pipes in heavy metal/hard rock.
The much hoped for reunion of a once massive band finally takes place, after years of bitter wrangling between the warring members……..
It’ll be disappointing shite that you’ll instantly regret having to sell your home to, if you can, get tickets for. But you’ll still pretend it was great to those chums who couldn’t and didn’t. And they won’t believe you either…..
Any new album by Echo And The Bunnymen will always be a 5/10 at best, with songs you will probably only play a couple of times, especially when you realise that Mac and Will (the only two original members) have no communication or relationship whatsover and that Mac (who still thinks he’s a star of Bowie type proportion) won’t let his old colleague (the absolute king of innovative post punk guitar) contribute anything to the writing of said new album.
Right now, every 50-something Afterworder is having a flashback to that terrible day when they realised that Scooby Doo was never going going to be the same. Nothing, not even the addition of Rasher to Dennis the Menace had prepared them for that. They were learning a valuable life lesson: even this must pass. But oh how cruelly that lesson was given.
A small (very small) crumb of comfort is that Scrappy inspired one of the best Simpson episodes “The Itchy and Scratchy and Poochie Show”.
‘never going to be the same’ – indeed because previous to that, every episode had been exactly the same – even to the repetitive backdrop as Scoob and Shaggy ran from the monster. It was as if the script (singular) had been written by Samuel Beckett.
He also got a mention in the 2010s reboot Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated. Fred: “we all promised each other that we would never speak of him”. A little bit Meta for the grown-ups.
Oh yes, the gang got very meta in the 21st Century reboot e.g. they catch the baddie, unmask him and there’s an uncomfortable silence. Shaggy stage-whispers – “this is the part where you say you would have got away with it if it wasn’t for the meddling kids”. The crook complies and all is right with the world.
The maid? If you mean the sturdy legs and skirt that appear occasionally, usually to kick Tom out the door, no problem. It is the ersatz stock Dennis the Menace type (US version) family members of later Bon Quimby’s that grate
The maid was called Mammy Two Shoes
We only ever saw her feet and her multiple petticoats being urgently pulled up when Jerry was spotted.
She was thoroughly respected/feared by Tom . I don’t recall seeing the (human) family at all in the classic Quimby cartoons.
Does that mean Crowded House are in this category then? I know the band always had a somewhat “floating” line up over the years and were a kind of core of Finn/Seymour/Hester but I did think it was a bit mean not to include Matt Sherrod, and especially Mark Hart in the latest line up at the expense of the Finn offspring.
Agreed, I think Mark Hart was dismissed in a pretty brutal way, given his contributions over the years. The ‘Finn Family’ CH albums are pretty dull and add nothing to their recording history. And then there’s the Glasto appearance when Neil got the grandkids up to to ‘sing’, on more than one song IIRC. Toe-curling.
Have to agree on this as well; the two Finn Family albums have all sounded very same-y with just too much double/triple tracked Neil singing and these airy falsetto vocals.
Christ, lads, listen to Together Alone and realize this is what the punters really love.
Not music related but any golfer who took the LIV golf petro-dollar was an insufferable tool who you would hate to play a round of golf with. I did up a list when the big names started to defect and, with the possible exception of John Rahm, one-by-one they obliged. De Chambeau, D. Johnson, García, Reed, Watson, Mickelson, Hatton. Arguably the PGA tour needs a few golfers you love to hate to add a bit of drama.
The NO songs I like most are the more electronic, dancey ones. Hooky plays his part there, which is fine but I don’t want him smearing his high bass all over every thing like he does on Technique. Hook off!
but when they mix him out, or replace him, it does make a huge difference and IMO not a good one – I personally love his work on Technique but thats just me!
Hooky is really only on half of Technique and it is still a great album. He’s only really on one track of Republic and it is… less so. But what a track Regret is.
I’m very sceptical of the whole “Lone Genius” idea. As evidence. I offer two examples:
1. Frank Zappa albums with Ian Underwood on them tend to be better than those without.
2. Prince made better records with the Revolution than without (SOTT was written when they were still a band)
There are so many iterations of the NPG that it’s difficult to ascribe a collective identity to them as you can for The Revolution. They are all undoubtedly great musicians in their own right, probably more so than the former band, but The Revolution were drilled so ruthlessly and incessantly that they became a machine with one singular drive and focus, if that makes sense. The NPGs always came across as a looser, more flexible affair, but The Revolution were On A Mission.
Maybe a better band, and I like all the NPG albums, but they rarely hit the heights of the Revolution albums. I like Prince in the 90s, I think that even as he was committing career suicide, the albums were still pretty good. I think the first one that really doesn’t deliver is Rave 2 the Joy Fantastic right at the end of the decade. Up until then it’s all good or very good, even underrated records like Come and Chaos and Disorder. But it’s rarely great.
I also think that the CD was not a good friend to Prince. 40 minute versions of Diamonds, Gold and Love Symbol would be killer bee (reading Kinky Friedman at the moment). We’d remember them more kindly.
Most of SOTT was actually written and performed by Prince solo, but yes, there are a number of the band collaborations around that time which have been collated on the SOTT Superdeluxe.
Even the Prince albums that are considered to be Revolution albums, these aren’t always actually including the whole band. Usually the odd member contributing here and there. Also, I don’t agree. Prince made great music, until he didn’t.
Let’s not overlook George Duke here.
I’m not sure about the weight of Ian Underwood’s contribution post-MOI. He’s ALL OVER Hot Rats of course, but every single note he played there was written and arranged by Zappa.
Once George Duke was in the band, Ian’s undoubted keyboard skills were no longer required, just his wind instrument skills. He didn’t seem especially significant to the ’73 band while he was in it.
Arf! British characters in US comedies are worth a thread of their own. We could call it “The British Poochie Thread”. Emily in Friends and Alex’s English boyfriend in Modern Family would be my nominations.
Not just comedies, we are watching the Landsmen on Paramount, not really my thing but it does star Billy Bob Thornton who wears a wig these days, which could be another thread.
Anyway this series has been featuring someone doing what I thought was a bad Australian accent but it turns out he’s meant to be from London. It’s not as bad as Daphne’s brother’s ‘Mancunian’ accent but then nothing compares to that.
I would say the opposite, most acts I love peaked later, between 3rd and 7th album. Springsteen, Dylan, Fabs, Stones, Kinks, Wilco, Who etc etc. There are a few that fit your category.
Third Album … well received debut album, critically panned/underperforming second album, third album is “sh*t or bust”:
The Jam – All Mod Cons
Iron Maiden – Number Of The Beast
Blur – Parklife
Rod Stewart – Every Picture Tells A Story
Blondie – Parallel Lines
Metallica – Master Of Puppets
Queen – Sheer Heart Attack
But, there are also moments when “Third Album brilliance” fails:
Oasis – Be Here Now
Springsteen – Born to Run
Talking Heads – Fear of Music
Beatles – A Hard Day’s Night
Clash – London Calling
Radiohead – OK Computer
The Who – The Who Sell Out
etc
I will always be a first album fundamentalist with The Chameleons. A debut the equal of The Clash, The Stone Roses etc. Lots of good stuff on Strange Times but nowhere near the consistent brilliant songwriting and arrangements of the debut.
Ooh. I have to disagree! First album is as great debut but definitely rawer. Strange Times is almost a concept album but is sequenced brilliantly. It’s really strong.
Are you seriously suggesting that Rod’s Gasoline Alley was critically panned?
It wasn’t underperforming because An Old Raincoat had hardly sold and in artistic terms it was a huge improvement on its predecessor.
Basic album – purchase
Deluxe edition with added outtakes, remixes or live versions – avoid. They’ll never be better than the original tracks and you will only play them once.
Don’t buy special edition box sets with loads of unreleased tracks and demos. If you wouldn’t eat a half cooked chicken, why listen to a half cooked recording.
Sophomore albums are always “difficult”, because 1) they are nearly always a bit too soon after the debut in order to cash in, 2) the artists have been toured half to death by their label and management and 3) they are generally comprised of the rejected songs from the debut album sessions and some hastily-cobbled filler.
But seriously folks – I start listening to one of these genre-mangling fusions (usually because it’s a fave rave on this very site and everybody loves it). I get two tunes in and it’s all getting a bit “Mumfords”: I realise I’ve fallen for it again. I like jazz, mind: and I like most folk (hell, I used to play the stuff). But when it’s like nouvelle cuisine and it’s oh so tasteful, I just want to throw it at the wall. I have a recent example – but I’ll keep it to myself (it’s a favourite on here, ending up in this year’s top 100).
Also: what in the writing or the sound makes anything “post-”? Happy to be educated, but it always sounded like marketing bollocks to me.
Tongue out of cheek, @fitterstoke , I’m broadly with you, outside those hybrids that actually describe the genres trying to be fused. But post????? I sort of get post-punk, in the sense of still short and simple, if with better melodys, musicianship and appearance, as opposed to any return to rock rock bloatisms. But all the other posts seem daft and an open invitation to lampooning.
The latest Mojo has an excellent Small Faces CD with it, to go with the Uncut equivalent in 2025.
No one will vote for it in next December’s ‘Best of Reissues’ list, it will be better than 95% of stuff on that list… and considerably cheaper.
It was either playing them endlessly for free, or three plays of a box set for 100/200 sovs. I’m already on four plays of the Small Faces, I got it at 10 a.m. today.
I do love mug punters, you can’t say I don’t, and you also can’t say they’re not, in their own way, loveable. Wouldn’t want their record collection. Bleedin’ expensive if nothing else! Keep it cheap.
Rules Of Thumb:
A Blue Note jazz album recorded between 1956 and 1965 will be worth a listen.
Any Duke Ellington album will be worth a listen.
Further Observations:
When The Who became a rock act rather than a pop act, the writing was on the wall.
The Beatles were right to break up in 1970. Becoming a rock act rather than a pop act would have destroyed their legacy.
The Rolling Stones return to their blues roots in ’68 saved them.
As someone who likes to buy albums without listening first, and enjoys taking the occasional chance on an artist I’ve never heard before and don’t know anything about, my rule of thumb in these cases is: You’ll have 100% better luck finding a new artist you’ll end up loving if you buy the album based only on the sleeve art and title/band name, than if you buy it based on an album review in a music magazine.
Anyone playing sitting down in a band who isn’t the drummer is taking themselves too seriously. Possible except for strings players and (maybe) keys players.
Anyone with a laptop on stage should be pasted with eggs and tomatoes.
Anyone with an interesting haircut is probably a limited talent. See also: glasses.
I fear glasses is too sweeping a rule. Even if you make the rule lairy glasses, you’re still getting rid of Elton John, Timmy Mallet and Reg Holdsworth.
‘Anyone playing sitting down in a band who isn’t the drummer is taking themselves too seriously. …’ Or the keyboard player. Or just old and/or drunk, like me.
Tintin
– don’t bother with anything before Cigars of the Pharoahs.
– the double stories are the best – (Unicorn, Crystal Balls, Moon), though Tibet is a late peak.
– the series really kicks off when Haddock and Calculus start appearing as foils.
– best steer away from Marlinspike to avoid the cringey characters (Jolyon Wagg, Prince Abdullah, Bianca Castafiore).
– Tintin, Haddock or Snowy seeing stars, getting drunk or experiencing hallucinations or angel/devil shoulder sitters is always a bonus.
– extra points for the Thom(p)son twins wearing matching outfits, contradicting each other in speech, double bonus for arresting Tintin.
When buying second hand LPs if the record sleeve has a barcode my heart always sinks a bit, (there are exceptions). I’m not one of those ‘best before bores’ it’s just that I prefer vintage stuff when I’m on a hunt. Although, having said that, mid-eighties stuff is becoming vintage, I suppose? but still seems modern to me.
If a sixties (occasionally early seventies) soundtrack has a track with the word ‘party’ or ‘groovy’ or a reference to drugs/ girls, I’ll buy it on the spot, especially if the sleeve art is done by a Mad magazine cartoonist.
Any horror film (that isn’t the A Nightmare On Elm Street franchise and even then only a few of those) starring Robert Englund are always cat shit.
Any horror film starring Vincent Price even if it’s cat shit will always be good fun, if not great.
On records, I like having the original versions rather than later reissues that added standalone hit singles to the track list. Even though it would be good to have them on there. This doesn’t make sense, I know.
Yes, my copy of the first Thomas Dolby album is missing a single b-side which was dropped for later issues. This irks me. I’m always on the hunt for a first pressing, even though I have the single (and so the b-side). And the CD. This doesn’t make sense, I know.
Absolutely. Teenage Kicks does not fit on Undertones and The Beat’s debut loses its cohesion with the addition of Tears Of A Clown and Ranking Full Stop, as does Young Americans with Fame.
At a pure manufacturing quality level mid 70s albums were impacted by oil prices and other resource shortages so vinyl became very thin and gatefold sleeves were reduced to a single sleeve. I’ve got some shockers from that era.
My copy of “Mott” doesn’t have the lovely fold out sleeve with loads of little pictures and cut outs. Grrr.
The more this thread develops, the more nuanced it becomes. It’s safe to say that The Beatles, Stones, Neil Young, Dylan, Van Morrison are safe. Also, you might as well forget about suggesting anything by Depeche Mode, OMD or Numan.
A stinker by someone you like very much is a necessary part of the process followed to become a fully-rounded genius. This makes the bad song good. Without that atrocity, it’s probable we would not have seen the good bits. Academics call it the Laughing Gnome paradox.
TV commercials – when people are dancing for no reason, it means the agency really couldn’t think of any way to promote the product (cf cars, apps, kitchen appliances, life insurance etc).
There’s been a couple where it’s worked, shoes (just concentrating on the shoes) and one for flooring (the flooring changed as the person danced) but yes I’m in agreement. The Happy Egg one where they danced with plates of egg was probably the worst.
Eurythmics:
Dave Stewart plays keyboards = wonderful
Dave Stewart plays the guitar = dreadful
I’m going to stick my neck out and say that the second clip is fantastic. Great song!
i’m going to be a sexist oaf and say that i’d forgotten how outrageously striking Ms Lennox is here…
Must be time (the hundredth time) for me to bring out “The night I stood Anne (never Annie in those days) Lennox up”….
@leffegin – yeah it’s a banger. In fact I have a soft spot for Be Yourself Tonight, a fantastic album
Surely he’s playing guitar on Thorn in my side? Great song.
Yes I don’t like them as a band a great deal but that song stands out. Also When Tomorrow Comes.
Yes, I love that one. And Missionary Man. I feel like I should go back and listen to the albums again. Oh yes, Beethoven (or whatever it’s called) is amazing as well. Completely bonkers.
Newark’s out Missionary Man as my example. Horrendous!
For me they were peerless doing the electronic stuff and then just turned into any average over produced 80s rock band (with a great singer) when they decided to “rock out”
“Newark’s?” Where did that come from. “Was going to have …”
Totally fair enough & possibly even correct; I just enjoy the rock stuff as much as the cooler electronic ones. To each their own.
Steve Earle:
Playing stuff like this= Wonderful
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=steve+earle+snake+oil&mid=06439C80AA11277E3F1D06439C80AA11277E3F1D
Playing Reggae= Please stop
https://www.bing.com/videos/riverview/relatedvideo?q=steve+earle+rivers+of+babylon&mid=9B735FD6483DEB176CF09B735FD6483DEB176CF0
You are correct, Sir.
Let’s face it, when it comes to white Americans attempting to play reggae, one probably doesn’t need all the fingers of a single hand to count the ones doing it right.
Surprising, since the ska, rock steady and reggae rhythms were all derived from New Orleans R&B originally.
Wasn’t reggae primarily derived from the Jamaican mento, a rhythm brought over from West Africa? That’s what I’ve always believed. Maybe I’m wrong, I don’t know.
You need to listen to the AW Reggaecast. Reggae came out of ska which formed when calypso bands in Jamaica started doing Fats Domino covers.
I’d forgotten about that one, but here it is:
From the estimable History of Rock Music in 500 songs – transcript for Episode 114: “My Boy Lollipop” by Millie:
“The music that the first sound systems played would include some mento records, and they would also play a fair number of latin-flavoured records. But the bulk of what they played was music for dancing, imported from America, made by Black American musicians, many of them the same musicians we looked at in the early months of this podcast. Louis Jordan was a big favourite, as was Wynonie Harris — the biggest hit in the early years of the sound systems was Harris’ “Bloodshot Eyes”. ..
The other artists who get repeatedly named in the histories of the early sound systems along with Jordan and Harris are Fats Domino, Lloyd Price, Professor Longhair — a musician we’ve not talked about in the podcast, but who made New Orleans R&B music in the same style as Domino and Price, and for slow-dancing the Moonglows and Jesse Belvin. They would also play jazz — Dizzy Gillespie, Duke Ellington, and Sarah Vaughan were particular favourites.”
If an album is consistently described as ‘important’, it is usually unlistenable.
Not sure why the vids aren’t showing
They are bing search results. They appear if you click on the links
Ah yes..That’ll teach me to post in a hurry…
The album of standards/Christmas songs is the soundtrack to 15 minutes grinding to a halt
A Mercury music prize winner is generally listened to twice.
Never trust an album review suggesting a heritage act shows a “return to form”.
Likewise show great suspicion to albums of cover versions, duets, or orchestral versions of earlier recordings by them.
You don’t want that “Christmas-themed” album.
Charity shop CDs indicate those artists losing favour. Despite hard work, Robbie Williams is in a steady decline.
Mozzer “returns with his much anticipated 14th solo album” apparently.
Much anticipated by whom, exactly?
His accountant, who is living in hope..?
Or possibly the Maldives…
Er…me.
This is new from Morrissey. You have too admire his chutzpah.
It’s a grower. And what I like specifically about it is that it couldn’t possibly have been made by anyone other than Morrissey. Flawed at times without a doubt, incorrigible and almost indefensible on occasions too. But always witty, original and surprising. For me modern pop or rock is wearingly bland relieved only by unusual and striking blasts like this. And it isn’t even close to being one of his best.
I have just spent time with an old friend in Florida. Ordinarily his musical taste is in sync with mine.
However he has a whole collection of Christmas albums by his favourite artists.
There isn’t a good one.
For me my rule of thumb is that anything with a linn drum or a slap bass is a pile of shit.
Christmas with Chet Atkins (who is one of my favourite guitar players) is the only decent one I can think of.
Also anything with some guest rapper talking over a verse should be avoided.
Kirsty MacColl’s Walking Down Madison being the exception.
I’d also argue that Blondie’s Rapture has merit, even if it is Debbie talking the talk. Actually, that is probably a plus.
Yes but she’s not a rapper nor is she a guest.
Rapture is a fantastic song, and Debbie’s rapping is fine. She and Chris Stein were culture vultures that were genuinely plugged into the emerging hip hop scene, unlike Malcom McLaren.
There was a brilliant Nash up called Rapture Riders which mixed Rapture with Riders on the Storm.
Ooh, yes – avoid avoid avoid!
Tracy Thorn, Josh Rouse and Nick Lowe have all produced decent Christmas albums.
Kim Wilde’s Christmas/Winter album is wonderful. As is The Unthanks’ In Winter.
Also, ‘Christmas’ by Low completely demolishes your premise.
I’m going to add the Smith & Burrows Funny Looking Angels to that list of great albums that are christmas themed.
Whilst there are clearly quite a few exceptions, I do agree with you general premise.
Wonderful album.
Impeccable. Took the family to a screening of the Snowman & The Snowdog at the Union Chapel with an orchestra a fair few Christmases ago and the second half of the show was basically Smith & Burrows playing the most christmassy cuts from the album. With added Tim Wheeler at some points as well. Simply the best Christmas thing I have ever done.
Bloody hell, that sounds like one of the greatest gigs ever staged.
The Snowman & Snowdog soundtrack is legitimately one of the best records of the last decade, and When The Thames Froze is among the most evocative Christmas songs ever written.
IMO you’re all missing the point – the only good Christmas music is the cheesy, bad kind of Christmas music! Don’t play “good” or “tasteful” Christmas music in my presence, please.
I love the novelty hits and the unlikely cover versions; that’s the true Christmas spirit to me!
I try a new Christmas album every year, and I choose them from two categories: either original songs by a band/artist in a genre that isn’t known for its Christmas songs, or well-known chestnuts sung by an artist that is an unlikely candidate for singing these.
The ones I end up disliking are the dull and too tasteful ones, the ones I play again next year are the wonderfully “bad” ones. But that’s just me, I guess!
The only Christmas albums worth anyone’s time are
1. The record of carols sung by the Kings College choir which my parents used to play when I was a kid and has long since been lost. Yes there are a million newer ones but they’re not the same.
2. The Phil Spector Christmas album.
Call me a sentimental old fool, but I’m very partial to the Ultralounge Christmas Cocktails Albums. I mean, come on…
Avoid any album where, when promoting it, the band say they made it for themselves first and foremost and if anyone else likes it then it’s a bonus.
Applaud and enjoy any album where, when promoting it, the band say they made it for themselves first and foremost and if anyone else doesn’t like it then they can fuck right off.
“Return to form” – approach with an open mind but set the bar low
“Return to form” = let’s just be grateful they’re not dead yet
“Return to form” = we’re clutching at straws, they were never much cop to start with.
Used to describe pretty much every Bowie album from the 80s onwards. Generally means one good song and a couple of half decent ones.
Ooh! Tiggs will be along in a minute…
Best since Scary Monsters? Yet another disappointment. Often received wisdom is received wisdom for a reason.
I can only repeat:
Most people regard his imperial phase as up to Scary Monsters. In the eighties, he made his money, having been ripped off by previous management. By Black Tie White Noise, he was in his mid forties and no longer a trend setter for the youth, but a comfortably rich middle aged man. That album was a celebration of his wedding a reflection on his life. He no longer had street free and stopped adopting different personas.
The post Tin Machine albums are packed with great tunes, not just one or two. Some are more experimental than others. Some work better than others. This is true of his imperial phase, too. I regard Hours as one his most personal, Heathen as a mature classic and Buddha Of Suburbia as an engrossing left field odd ball. The only post 1990 album I revisit infrequently is Earthling.
He did great work at every stage of his life.
😀
Except mid 80s
And mid 60s
Great singles (and sales) in the eighties. He took a while to get going in the sixties. 😉
Mid -60s is my favourite era of Bowie. How do you like them apples?
Commendably loyal. 🫡
You used those very words about the patchy recent Van album. “I’m wearing my blue jumper” etc. 😛
Digression, I confess, but here is a useful rule of thumb while holidaying in Scotland.
Never go to hostelry with a big red T outside. They are invariably the roughest joint in town.
Especially if it has a flat roof.
That rule equally applies south of the border, too.
Bands with a replacement lead singer are never as good (Iron Maiden notable exception to the rule).
I’d throw the Undertones into this debate. I don’t think anyone really misses Fearghal any more.
We saw them in December and Paul McCloon was excellent, if a little camp.
Would Sabbath with RJD count too?
Sabbath with RJD were effectively a different band and worked best when they operated as such. The live performances when they reformed as Heaven & Hell and played only RJD era songs were very good. Live Evil, which has Ronnie singing both his own and Ozzy songs, is not.
I’ll have to give Live Evil a go sometime. I love the two RJD Sabbath albums….much more than any of the Ozzy albums which I know will cause me to burn in hell.
I think RJD had the finest set of pipes in heavy metal/hard rock.
Discuss!
Certainly he was one of the technically gifted singers, but more importantly: he had the vibe. The lore. He really was the personification of metal.
Agree, he was the greatest hard rock singer. I’m so glad I saw him with Rainbow.
I can’t hear a vocalist on Live Evil. Sometimes, I can’t hear Miles’s trumpet.
Arf!
I’m entirely of the same opinion too.
Loved Ozzy too, but mainly (98% or so) as a solo artist and tremendous live performer in the 80s.
RJD was great for the first few Rainbow albums too
I do
The much hoped for reunion of a once massive band finally takes place, after years of bitter wrangling between the warring members……..
It’ll be disappointing shite that you’ll instantly regret having to sell your home to, if you can, get tickets for. But you’ll still pretend it was great to those chums who couldn’t and didn’t. And they won’t believe you either…..
Any new album by Echo And The Bunnymen will always be a 5/10 at best, with songs you will probably only play a couple of times, especially when you realise that Mac and Will (the only two original members) have no communication or relationship whatsover and that Mac (who still thinks he’s a star of Bowie type proportion) won’t let his old colleague (the absolute king of innovative post punk guitar) contribute anything to the writing of said new album.
“Mac” will always reference “Bowie’s keks” in every interview in the midst of the boasting and general self-aggrandisment.
Christ, is he still like that?
I have no idea but I’ll put money on it.
Pretty sure he is unfortunately.
With the funny hair, n everything? FFS. He”s the alt rock version of Vince Neill.
Don’t forget The Big Coat.
If it says Fred Quimby at the beginning of a Tom & Jerry cartoon – then you’re in for a treat.
If it’s one where Tom’s face replaces the MGM lion, then it’s a shit one.
Similarly, anything with Scrappy Doo = shit.
Right now, every 50-something Afterworder is having a flashback to that terrible day when they realised that Scooby Doo was never going going to be the same. Nothing, not even the addition of Rasher to Dennis the Menace had prepared them for that. They were learning a valuable life lesson: even this must pass. But oh how cruelly that lesson was given.
A small (very small) crumb of comfort is that Scrappy inspired one of the best Simpson episodes “The Itchy and Scratchy and Poochie Show”.
“Poochie died on the way to his planet”
‘never going to be the same’ – indeed because previous to that, every episode had been exactly the same – even to the repetitive backdrop as Scoob and Shaggy ran from the monster. It was as if the script (singular) had been written by Samuel Beckett.
Waiting For Godoo.
“And I would have got away with it, if it weren’t for you meddling kids”
He also got a mention in the 2010s reboot Scooby-Doo! Mystery Incorporated. Fred: “we all promised each other that we would never speak of him”. A little bit Meta for the grown-ups.
Oh yes, the gang got very meta in the 21st Century reboot e.g. they catch the baddie, unmask him and there’s an uncomfortable silence. Shaggy stage-whispers – “this is the part where you say you would have got away with it if it wasn’t for the meddling kids”. The crook complies and all is right with the world.
I’m not sure I’m down with that.
Correct.
Used to love it if Spike the Bulldog was ever involved. Tom’s endless twattings were always administered well by Spike.
Spike was brilliant, particularly when he’s protecting his sappy little son. Dat’s Ma boy!
“Now listen here pussycat……”
What the AW view on T and J episodes with “the maid”? Awks, or laffs?
The maid? If you mean the sturdy legs and skirt that appear occasionally, usually to kick Tom out the door, no problem. It is the ersatz stock Dennis the Menace type (US version) family members of later Bon Quimby’s that grate
The maid was called Mammy Two Shoes
We only ever saw her feet and her multiple petticoats being urgently pulled up when Jerry was spotted.
She was thoroughly respected/feared by Tom . I don’t recall seeing the (human) family at all in the classic Quimby cartoons.
Mistyped: post Quimby’s was what I meant to type.
Bon Quimby later changed his name to Bon Scott – and the rest is history…
When the kids get added to the band.
Does that mean Crowded House are in this category then? I know the band always had a somewhat “floating” line up over the years and were a kind of core of Finn/Seymour/Hester but I did think it was a bit mean not to include Matt Sherrod, and especially Mark Hart in the latest line up at the expense of the Finn offspring.
Agreed, I think Mark Hart was dismissed in a pretty brutal way, given his contributions over the years. The ‘Finn Family’ CH albums are pretty dull and add nothing to their recording history. And then there’s the Glasto appearance when Neil got the grandkids up to to ‘sing’, on more than one song IIRC. Toe-curling.
Have to agree on this as well; the two Finn Family albums have all sounded very same-y with just too much double/triple tracked Neil singing and these airy falsetto vocals.
Christ, lads, listen to Together Alone and realize this is what the punters really love.
Jeff Tweedy an exception to this, but his kids are in his other band rather than Wilco (that lineup hasn’t changed in more than 20 years)
Hmmm … Tom Waits added his son Casey (on “turntables”) to the band on “Top of the Hill” – the opening track of the “Real Gone” album. It was shite.
Not music related but any golfer who took the LIV golf petro-dollar was an insufferable tool who you would hate to play a round of golf with. I did up a list when the big names started to defect and, with the possible exception of John Rahm, one-by-one they obliged. De Chambeau, D. Johnson, García, Reed, Watson, Mickelson, Hatton. Arguably the PGA tour needs a few golfers you love to hate to add a bit of drama.
Poulter. Don’t forget Poulter.
Koepka, but he’s going back
Lee Westwood. I remember him being quite proud that he had never read a book
Yeah – and a big thumbs-down for Henrik Stenson, too. He really let himself down there.
When listening to New Order, note the bass player. If it is Peter Hook, it will be wonderful
And if the bass is not being twanged by Peter Hook it will not be brilliant
See also Simple Minds and Derek Forbes.
That would be Hook’s Law. Double the stretch of the bass strngs, double the quality of the music. When Peter plucked a peck of Perfect Kiss…
There is a rule about the more you can hear Hooky’s bass, the better the song as well.
The NO songs I like most are the more electronic, dancey ones. Hooky plays his part there, which is fine but I don’t want him smearing his high bass all over every thing like he does on Technique. Hook off!
but when they mix him out, or replace him, it does make a huge difference and IMO not a good one – I personally love his work on Technique but thats just me!
It’s the excess I don’t like but in moderation…Love his books too.
Hooky is really only on half of Technique and it is still a great album. He’s only really on one track of Republic and it is… less so. But what a track Regret is.
If i had to pick from two buckets, one containing Hooky to the Fore and the other Hooky Lite, I’d go Http everytime.
I’m very sceptical of the whole “Lone Genius” idea. As evidence. I offer two examples:
1. Frank Zappa albums with Ian Underwood on them tend to be better than those without.
2. Prince made better records with the Revolution than without (SOTT was written when they were still a band)
How do you rate The New Power Generation?
There are so many iterations of the NPG that it’s difficult to ascribe a collective identity to them as you can for The Revolution. They are all undoubtedly great musicians in their own right, probably more so than the former band, but The Revolution were drilled so ruthlessly and incessantly that they became a machine with one singular drive and focus, if that makes sense. The NPGs always came across as a looser, more flexible affair, but The Revolution were On A Mission.
Maybe a better band, and I like all the NPG albums, but they rarely hit the heights of the Revolution albums. I like Prince in the 90s, I think that even as he was committing career suicide, the albums were still pretty good. I think the first one that really doesn’t deliver is Rave 2 the Joy Fantastic right at the end of the decade. Up until then it’s all good or very good, even underrated records like Come and Chaos and Disorder. But it’s rarely great.
I also think that the CD was not a good friend to Prince. 40 minute versions of Diamonds, Gold and Love Symbol would be killer bee (reading Kinky Friedman at the moment). We’d remember them more kindly.
Most of SOTT was actually written and performed by Prince solo, but yes, there are a number of the band collaborations around that time which have been collated on the SOTT Superdeluxe.
Even the Prince albums that are considered to be Revolution albums, these aren’t always actually including the whole band. Usually the odd member contributing here and there. Also, I don’t agree. Prince made great music, until he didn’t.
I would amend that to *Ruth* Underwood.
Surely both can be true?
Let’s not overlook George Duke here.
I’m not sure about the weight of Ian Underwood’s contribution post-MOI. He’s ALL OVER Hot Rats of course, but every single note he played there was written and arranged by Zappa.
Once George Duke was in the band, Ian’s undoubted keyboard skills were no longer required, just his wind instrument skills. He didn’t seem especially significant to the ’73 band while he was in it.
Not a band or artist, but very close to my heart: if any of Daphne’s family are in it, don’t watch the episode of Frasier.
Don’t bother with any episode of Frasier after Daphne and Niles consummate their relationship.
Nah, there are many great episodes after that. Did become slightly more inconsistent though
Arf! British characters in US comedies are worth a thread of their own. We could call it “The British Poochie Thread”. Emily in Friends and Alex’s English boyfriend in Modern Family would be my nominations.
Not just comedies, we are watching the Landsmen on Paramount, not really my thing but it does star Billy Bob Thornton who wears a wig these days, which could be another thread.
Anyway this series has been featuring someone doing what I thought was a bad Australian accent but it turns out he’s meant to be from London. It’s not as bad as Daphne’s brother’s ‘Mancunian’ accent but then nothing compares to that.
With a few honourable exceptions, most bands say all they have to say on their first 2 albums.
When bands split up, the individual members may go onto successful solo careers, but the missing chemistry means the quality is not as good.
I would say the opposite, most acts I love peaked later, between 3rd and 7th album. Springsteen, Dylan, Fabs, Stones, Kinks, Wilco, Who etc etc. There are a few that fit your category.
Third Album … well received debut album, critically panned/underperforming second album, third album is “sh*t or bust”:
The Jam – All Mod Cons
Iron Maiden – Number Of The Beast
Blur – Parklife
Rod Stewart – Every Picture Tells A Story
Blondie – Parallel Lines
Metallica – Master Of Puppets
Queen – Sheer Heart Attack
But, there are also moments when “Third Album brilliance” fails:
Oasis – Be Here Now
Springsteen – Born to Run
Talking Heads – Fear of Music
Beatles – A Hard Day’s Night
Clash – London Calling
Radiohead – OK Computer
The Who – The Who Sell Out
etc
Works well for quite a few
And Peter Gabriel (solo)
Chameleons. Strange Times, their 3rd, is their meisterwerk after well received debut and (slightly) panned 2nd
I will always be a first album fundamentalist with The Chameleons. A debut the equal of The Clash, The Stone Roses etc. Lots of good stuff on Strange Times but nowhere near the consistent brilliant songwriting and arrangements of the debut.
Ooh. I have to disagree! First album is as great debut but definitely rawer. Strange Times is almost a concept album but is sequenced brilliantly. It’s really strong.
So there!
I’m with Freddy on this. Strange Times was their peak.
Thank you @malc
Most of my Cams fans mates agree with Mr Moles though.
Are you seriously suggesting that Rod’s Gasoline Alley was critically panned?
It wasn’t underperforming because An Old Raincoat had hardly sold and in artistic terms it was a huge improvement on its predecessor.
Basic album – purchase
Deluxe edition with added outtakes, remixes or live versions – avoid. They’ll never be better than the original tracks and you will only play them once.
Exception, early Kinks albums. All of the first 3 are vastly improved when they added concurrent singles, B sides or EP tracks to the special editions
Unless it’s the Beatles because you need the version of “Piggies” with different pig noises. In a die cut box.
‘Imperial’ phase = Find out when that is and then play the others.
Don’t buy special edition box sets with loads of unreleased tracks and demos. If you wouldn’t eat a half cooked chicken, why listen to a half cooked recording.
Ah, but what if it was a half-cooked Corsair chicken?
Depends which half you were served, the raw or the cooked.
Would it hamper your decision making?
Fourth album in and we decide on a celtic/folk sound. That`ll be you Ultravox, or possible Skids..
Or Van Morrison.
“That difficult sophomore album” = we’ve run out of ideas already.
“Acoustic versions of our best known songs” = now we’ve really run out of ideas.
Sophomore albums are always “difficult”, because 1) they are nearly always a bit too soon after the debut in order to cash in, 2) the artists have been toured half to death by their label and management and 3) they are generally comprised of the rejected songs from the debut album sessions and some hastily-cobbled filler.
The Last Dinner Party’s ‘From The Pyre’ being a very honourable exception.
“Jazz-Folk hybridisation” – neither fish nor fowl, should be hit with a length of 2×4 until it stops.
As for “Genre-melding” – pass the sick bucket, Mabel…
‘An audacious fusion’ appeared a few times in the Cambridge Folk Festival programme.
You may be right about jazz-folk, but folk-jazz is terrific.
How are you on post genres: post-folk, post-jazz and suchlike?
Now you’re just toying with me…
But seriously folks – I start listening to one of these genre-mangling fusions (usually because it’s a fave rave on this very site and everybody loves it). I get two tunes in and it’s all getting a bit “Mumfords”: I realise I’ve fallen for it again. I like jazz, mind: and I like most folk (hell, I used to play the stuff). But when it’s like nouvelle cuisine and it’s oh so tasteful, I just want to throw it at the wall. I have a recent example – but I’ll keep it to myself (it’s a favourite on here, ending up in this year’s top 100).
Also: what in the writing or the sound makes anything “post-”? Happy to be educated, but it always sounded like marketing bollocks to me.
Agreed. What some think “tasteful”, I think “mimsy”. Keep the abandon and playfulness.
I’m a folktronica man. Straight down the line.
Is that gaelictronica, afrotonix or just plain?
Tongue out of cheek, @fitterstoke , I’m broadly with you, outside those hybrids that actually describe the genres trying to be fused. But post????? I sort of get post-punk, in the sense of still short and simple, if with better melodys, musicianship and appearance, as opposed to any return to rock rock bloatisms. But all the other posts seem daft and an open invitation to lampooning.
Anything that is post Mumfords sounds fine, mind. Just let me avoid per Mumfords.
Buy things that don’t cost much.
The latest Mojo has an excellent Small Faces CD with it, to go with the Uncut equivalent in 2025.
No one will vote for it in next December’s ‘Best of Reissues’ list, it will be better than 95% of stuff on that list… and considerably cheaper.
I voted for a free CD a couple of times – Lennon and Wilco
So did deram…
It was either playing them endlessly for free, or three plays of a box set for 100/200 sovs. I’m already on four plays of the Small Faces, I got it at 10 a.m. today.
I do love mug punters, you can’t say I don’t, and you also can’t say they’re not, in their own way, loveable. Wouldn’t want their record collection. Bleedin’ expensive if nothing else! Keep it cheap.
No criticism implied. But you stated that no-one would vote for these freebies – and you already have. And I don’t think you were the only one…
Rules Of Thumb:
A Blue Note jazz album recorded between 1956 and 1965 will be worth a listen.
Any Duke Ellington album will be worth a listen.
Further Observations:
When The Who became a rock act rather than a pop act, the writing was on the wall.
The Beatles were right to break up in 1970. Becoming a rock act rather than a pop act would have destroyed their legacy.
The Rolling Stones return to their blues roots in ’68 saved them.
Also they couldn’t rock for toffee.
Also:
A Blue Note jazz album recorded between 1956 and 1965 will have a brilliant cover design.
As someone who likes to buy albums without listening first, and enjoys taking the occasional chance on an artist I’ve never heard before and don’t know anything about, my rule of thumb in these cases is: You’ll have 100% better luck finding a new artist you’ll end up loving if you buy the album based only on the sleeve art and title/band name, than if you buy it based on an album review in a music magazine.
Sound. Very sound.
Very, very sound.
Anyone playing sitting down in a band who isn’t the drummer is taking themselves too seriously. Possible except for strings players and (maybe) keys players.
Anyone with a laptop on stage should be pasted with eggs and tomatoes.
Anyone with an interesting haircut is probably a limited talent. See also: glasses.
A Mr Costello to see you, Twang. And he’s not happy.
Mr Fripp couldn’t care less.
I fear glasses is too sweeping a rule. Even if you make the rule lairy glasses, you’re still getting rid of Elton John, Timmy Mallet and Reg Holdsworth.
All 3 were brilliant in Twin Peaks.
Unless you play cello, in which case the reverse is true.
I’ll raise you Chopper, to prove that thought wrong.
Getting it under the chin could prove difficult.
If not terminal.
Glasses? Now that’s just being silly, Holly, Lennon, John, Costello, Tweedy, Partridge etc etc
Yes possibly over harsh. Drink had been taken.
Yeah – and Hank B Marvin!
And Cliff! (For a while)
‘kin hell, you’re going to make John Martyn stand up for the whole show?
Impossible. He’d fall over half way through the second song.
‘Anyone playing sitting down in a band who isn’t the drummer is taking themselves too seriously. …’ Or the keyboard player. Or just old and/or drunk, like me.
…or The Chieftans…
If the album title is Love Beach
“Brave”, “audacious”……. Usually precede a period of rehab.
‘We decided to just go into the studio and see what happened’ [We didn’t have any ideas and hadn’t given it any thought until we absolutely had to.]
‘Cathartic, primal scream, harrowing.’
Actually quite dull and tedious.
Tintin
– don’t bother with anything before Cigars of the Pharoahs.
– the double stories are the best – (Unicorn, Crystal Balls, Moon), though Tibet is a late peak.
– the series really kicks off when Haddock and Calculus start appearing as foils.
– best steer away from Marlinspike to avoid the cringey characters (Jolyon Wagg, Prince Abdullah, Bianca Castafiore).
– Tintin, Haddock or Snowy seeing stars, getting drunk or experiencing hallucinations or angel/devil shoulder sitters is always a bonus.
– extra points for the Thom(p)son twins wearing matching outfits, contradicting each other in speech, double bonus for arresting Tintin.
My rule of thumb is to be very careful when opening a tin. Didn’t work tonight.
Certainly risky, you tough old 4-legged beast!

A few logs on the fire as our leaders might say…
When buying second hand LPs if the record sleeve has a barcode my heart always sinks a bit, (there are exceptions). I’m not one of those ‘best before bores’ it’s just that I prefer vintage stuff when I’m on a hunt. Although, having said that, mid-eighties stuff is becoming vintage, I suppose? but still seems modern to me.
If a sixties (occasionally early seventies) soundtrack has a track with the word ‘party’ or ‘groovy’ or a reference to drugs/ girls, I’ll buy it on the spot, especially if the sleeve art is done by a Mad magazine cartoonist.
Any horror film (that isn’t the A Nightmare On Elm Street franchise and even then only a few of those) starring Robert Englund are always cat shit.
Any horror film starring Vincent Price even if it’s cat shit will always be good fun, if not great.
On records, I like having the original versions rather than later reissues that added standalone hit singles to the track list. Even though it would be good to have them on there. This doesn’t make sense, I know.
Yes, my copy of the first Thomas Dolby album is missing a single b-side which was dropped for later issues. This irks me. I’m always on the hunt for a first pressing, even though I have the single (and so the b-side). And the CD. This doesn’t make sense, I know.
Absolutely. Teenage Kicks does not fit on Undertones and The Beat’s debut loses its cohesion with the addition of Tears Of A Clown and Ranking Full Stop, as does Young Americans with Fame.
Fame wasn’t originally on YA? News to me
Well. It wasn’t planned to be. 😀
I think it fits ok, but he really shouldn’t have done Across the Universe
* Fame ‘90 doesn’t fit anywhere. Dreadful
I have Fame 90 attached to a reissue of Low on CD. It certainly doesn’t belong on there.
Didn’t know that about Teenage Kicks.
Gary Numan had 2 top 5 singles released just before his LP, Telekon. They are not on the original album but they are now.
At a pure manufacturing quality level mid 70s albums were impacted by oil prices and other resource shortages so vinyl became very thin and gatefold sleeves were reduced to a single sleeve. I’ve got some shockers from that era.
My copy of “Mott” doesn’t have the lovely fold out sleeve with loads of little pictures and cut outs. Grrr.
The more this thread develops, the more nuanced it becomes. It’s safe to say that The Beatles, Stones, Neil Young, Dylan, Van Morrison are safe. Also, you might as well forget about suggesting anything by Depeche Mode, OMD or Numan.
A stinker by someone you like very much is a necessary part of the process followed to become a fully-rounded genius. This makes the bad song good. Without that atrocity, it’s probable we would not have seen the good bits. Academics call it the Laughing Gnome paradox.
I’m confused. 😲
Dammit – I meant for that to be in the other thread.
The ‘People are People’ perspective?
Perhaps. Yet I do have phases of liking PAP. The Meaning of Love Inversion might work better.
TV commercials – when people are dancing for no reason, it means the agency really couldn’t think of any way to promote the product (cf cars, apps, kitchen appliances, life insurance etc).
There’s been a couple where it’s worked, shoes (just concentrating on the shoes) and one for flooring (the flooring changed as the person danced) but yes I’m in agreement. The Happy Egg one where they danced with plates of egg was probably the worst.
Who can forget women laughing at salad?

Years of trying, I never got the joke…unless it was on me?
‘… best of his/hers/their generation’ at the end of a sentence.
That always means ‘not as good as the 60s’.