Great news from two great blokes. They are obviously still close mates full of love for their music, each other, and their late comrade. More power to their collective elbows.
I climbed aboard the Rush bus a bit late, and can take or leave their very early, bluesy stuff, but I love their prog epics and the synth years. Also, they are an absolute powerhouse of a live band who don’t take themselves entirely seriously and always put on a good show.
Obviously it can never be the same without Neil, but I’m sure they’ll draw huge crowds. I’d like to be there, hoping to hear a track or two from Clockwork Angels, which is probably my fave from them.
Lots of FB puff getting into my feed about this reunion, particularly focusing on the new drummer. I’m sure she’ll be great (else they wouldn’t have hired her). I expect her being blonde and good-looking will not be a hindrance.
Never took to Rush in the Neil Peart days and I don’t see myself changing that opinion.
And here. I’m not a Rush expert – or a drummer – but there’s something in her sound and her approach to floor toms in particular that reminds me of Neil…
I’ve been watching a few on her channel, and she’s obviously a superb choice. I detect a lot of influences including Peter Erskine Jr. – which is not the easiest style. Very good. She will give them a kick, and they will probably step up.
A major change such as this could be either a new lease of life for the band or their end. I’m very much in favour of American rock, the most sexist of genres, incorporating good female musos.
Rush seem like good blokes based on the doco that was on Netflix but I find them hard to listen to. The singing is painful and the music is a bit unimaginative – mundane if complicated. I have tried… What’s the “essential track”? Or 3?
You better not come to Canada and say that! I tend to agree though, I did like Spirit of Radio when that was riding high in the charts, probably not typical though
If you don’t like Tom Sawyer, I don’t think you’ll like the rest.
In the early 80s, they were one of the few acts that blended hard rock and synth pop, and I think the albums they made then are still interesting and have aged well.
If I were you I’d start at Moving Pictures (see Hawkfall’s comment re Tom Sawyer.) and end at Hold your Fire, but that’s just me. I do love a bit of Rush , much prefer their imperial synth phase and have to be in the right mood for their epic progness. But they certainly scratch an itch.
You would have enjoyed last night’s gig then. My mate is a massive fan and much prefers the epic progness to the smaller imperial synth phase. He thinks I’m a philistine.
Lovely blokes. They really have a collective heart, don’t they?
I’ve just read about this. Crikey, bit of a surprise but I wish them well.
paging @Steve-Walsh
Think it’s rather lovely.
Great news from two great blokes. They are obviously still close mates full of love for their music, each other, and their late comrade. More power to their collective elbows.
I climbed aboard the Rush bus a bit late, and can take or leave their very early, bluesy stuff, but I love their prog epics and the synth years. Also, they are an absolute powerhouse of a live band who don’t take themselves entirely seriously and always put on a good show.
Obviously it can never be the same without Neil, but I’m sure they’ll draw huge crowds. I’d like to be there, hoping to hear a track or two from Clockwork Angels, which is probably my fave from them.
I thought they had said that they would never tour under the name of Rush again
@dai Time (and maybe Money) changes everything
On BlueSky: “Rush is reuniting with a woman as the drummer and I think it’s very sweet that Rush fans will get to see a woman once before they die”
I am sure the drummer will be great. The bigger question, perhaps, is whether Geddy can still reach the high notes.
I’m not sure Geddy’s been able to reach those high notes for some years now.
Lots of FB puff getting into my feed about this reunion, particularly focusing on the new drummer. I’m sure she’ll be great (else they wouldn’t have hired her). I expect her being blonde and good-looking will not be a hindrance.
Never took to Rush in the Neil Peart days and I don’t see myself changing that opinion.
Well, here she is, Mike…
And here. I’m not a Rush expert – or a drummer – but there’s something in her sound and her approach to floor toms in particular that reminds me of Neil…
…or am I wildly out of order here?
I’ve been watching a few on her channel, and she’s obviously a superb choice. I detect a lot of influences including Peter Erskine Jr. – which is not the easiest style. Very good. She will give them a kick, and they will probably step up.
A major change such as this could be either a new lease of life for the band or their end. I’m very much in favour of American rock, the most sexist of genres, incorporating good female musos.
Anyone who’s seen Spinal Tap II is probably picturing the same audition scene as I am. 🙂
Happy days
I’m off to see Moving Pictures, a Rush tribute band, on Saturday…yay! I wonder if they’ll have a new drummer?
They have a drummer and she is very good indeed as are the guitarist and Geddy lookalike bassist (trying a bit too hard if I’m honest.)
Cracking stuff though
Rush seem like good blokes based on the doco that was on Netflix but I find them hard to listen to. The singing is painful and the music is a bit unimaginative – mundane if complicated. I have tried… What’s the “essential track”? Or 3?
You better not come to Canada and say that! I tend to agree though, I did like Spirit of Radio when that was riding high in the charts, probably not typical though
If you don’t like Tom Sawyer, I don’t think you’ll like the rest.
In the early 80s, they were one of the few acts that blended hard rock and synth pop, and I think the albums they made then are still interesting and have aged well.
@twang
If I were you I’d start at Moving Pictures (see Hawkfall’s comment re Tom Sawyer.) and end at Hold your Fire, but that’s just me. I do love a bit of Rush , much prefer their imperial synth phase and have to be in the right mood for their epic progness. But they certainly scratch an itch.
(…I quite like their epic progness…)
@fitterstoke
So do I.
When I’m in mood!
Badly phrased, @Freddy-Steady: I think what I meant was that I preferred their epic progness to their imperial synth phase…
Absolutely! No problem.
You would have enjoyed last night’s gig then. My mate is a massive fan and much prefers the epic progness to the smaller imperial synth phase. He thinks I’m a philistine.
any excuse to post this again, one of the best openings to a gig I’ve ever come across