I’m here all week.

It’s on both sides though. The outrage and the outrage at the outrage. I’m not sure it’s worse. I just think modern technology makes it louder and more credible looking.

Ah – so you didn’t mean to mean it. That explains a lot.

Who is telling you? I genuinely don’t feel I’m being told what to be outraged about.

We should. I’m not sure what your words mean but I will assume the apology wasn’t heartfelt.

Both Gary Glitter and Rolf Harris are freely available on Spotify. And Apple Music. There are playlists and everything. How is that erased from history? You can’t just make stuff up.

I’m still really not bothered what you do with it but thanks for clarifying. I don’t think I have ever advocated people having to get rid of stuff because the artist has broken the law. Everyone can make their […]

Nope. You can do what you want with it – I’m really not bothered. I’m not sure why you think I would think you should.

My points, put simply, to avoid unnecessary conflation, are that I respect the organisers […]

None of it matters really in that context. I’m really just defending the right of organisers to change their mind of who they have at their events.

Wow. Where are you getting all that from?

I am only referring to his cancelled appearance and, basically, defending the organisers right to cancel him. Think of it as freedom to act.

You seem to have a […]

Well, rising above the condescension, that’s still not answering the question.

Have another go.

Do you think he is innocent?

You actually think he’s innocent then?

This is what they said:

Responding to criticism of the line-up announcement on the festival’s Facebook page, organisers said: “We truly appreciate you alerting us to the issue. It has been passed on to our […]

Most of that makes sense. But have the festival organisers said that they feel bullied? I thought they said that they hadn’t realised the sordid backstory. So not sure why that’s bullying.

Now that’s hit the nail on the head.

That’s not what’s happening though. Appearing at a literary event that is run for profit is not a democratic right. Wyman cannot court publicity and then complain when members of the public do the opposite. Th […]

In what?

Good that you’ve clarified that.

I find both worrying. I’m not sure we need to rank them in order. They are either wrong or not really.

Not convinced a 13 year old girl thinking it’s ok is enough for a 47 year old man to have a relationship with her. I find that logic extremely odd.