You may not know the name, but Giorgio Gomelsky (pictured here with a young, crew-cutted Eric Clapton) was a giant of the 60s London blues and R&B scene.
Now Read on…
http://i.imgur.com/UUOIvOH.jpg
Musings on the byways of popular culture
You may not know the name, but Giorgio Gomelsky (pictured here with a young, crew-cutted Eric Clapton) was a giant of the 60s London blues and R&B scene.
Now Read on…
http://i.imgur.com/UUOIvOH.jpg
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Film maker, impresario, music manager, songwriter and record producer Giorgio Gomelsky – 28 February 1934 – 13 January 2016
Born in Georgia, USSR, he came to London where he started the Crawdaddy Club and installed the Rolling Stones as house band (he was their manager at the time)
He brought in The Yardbirds (who he also managed) to replace the Stones and produced their early records.
He started the now hugely collectable Marmalade record label and signed Julie Driscoll, Brian Auger & the Trinity and Blossom Toes
Gomelsky was also instrumental in the careers of The Soft Machine, Daevid Allen and Gong, Magma, and Material.
A great man, he was always a champion of British blues and R&B
Marmalade also released the pretty far out John Stevens & The Spontaneous Music Ensemble around 1969. The album is sometimes known as ‘Oliv’. Probably paid for from the proceeds of the rest of the catalogue.
True. And of course all those original Marmalade LPs are now hugely collectable.
Here’s a Julie Driscoll single B-Side
http://i.imgur.com/j8IhCbw.jpg
The John Stevens/SME sleeve, featuring straight-scaring bearded hairy John Stevens himself:
http://i917.photobucket.com/albums/ad15/camplimp/spont_zpsvuma5edr.jpg
and from the album itself, this almost certainly scared away the straights:
I had a copy of the SME LP Karyōbin on the pink Island label. I won’t say it was difficult listening, but It made Beefheart sound like Abba.
Sold it years ago before the price exploded. Even the CD now sells for around a hundred quid.
http://i.imgur.com/zzISYPQ.jpg
I’d love to own a copy of ‘Karyobin’ – I think it’ entrancing, by far the most inviting of all the British ‘free improvisation’ recordings I’ve heard (it’s on youtube). There’s a terrific, very readable and non-pretentious book on the golden age of British free music called ‘Beyond Jazz’, published a few months back. John Stevens and his gang occupy a fair amount of it. He was a hugely influential figure in the London-centric jazz world of the mid 60s to mid 70s – the coverage, in the latter 60s, of JS and of the ‘new thing’ he proselytised far outstripped the record sales and audience sizes it received. I find it fascinating stuff.
The saxophonist for the SME, Evan Parker said something interesting about Stevens:
“Stevens had two basic rules: (1) If you can’t hear another musician, you’re playing too loud, and (2) if the music you’re producing doesn’t regularly relate to what you’re hearing others create, why be in the group?”
This meant that although the music they produced is certainly challenging (and it’s definitely not my cup of jazz tea), it’s by no means blarting skronky free jazz noise.
Here’s a bit of pointless (but strangely compelling) trivia.
I sold my CD copy of Karyobin early last year to one of the physios at newly promoted Bournemouth AFC.
Which makes all our preconceptions about football suddenly fly out the window.
Sorry, correction. Just checked my emails and it was the Conference & Events Manager, not one of the physios.
Is it called Beyond Jazz or Jazz Beyond Jazz? Both sound like my sort of book, one looks to be more US based
I may buy both
Brian Jones-era Stones, The Yardbirds, Julie Driscoll, Blossom Toes, Gong……you just said the magic words!
I last bought a daily newspaper about 20 years ago, and I remember that a day rarely went by without an obituary for an old jazz or blues artist.
Looks like the next ten years will be the turn of post-war pop/rock music.
I think we should declare a moratorium on artistic deaths for the rest of the month.
No more croaks.
I’m over em
In January 1964 Pat Richards launched a monthly magazine, Jazz Beat. It’s first feature was by Giorgio Gomelsky. The mag lasted until December 1966. Here’s a scan of the feature in question. Hope I’ve managed to capture all the “scanning anomalies”.
Is
there
a RHYTHM & BLUES BOOM
by Giorgio Gomelsky
JazzBeat January 1964 pps 6 & 30
THE music known as “rhythm and blues” has been much in the news over the past 6 months or so.
Everyone in the music business from the Beatles to George Cooper, the agent, from The Shadows to Harold Pendleton of the National Jazz Federation ‑ seems to have expressed almost overwhelming joy about the fact that r & b is “happening” in this country.
Alter some fairly penetrating scrutiny it becomes fairly obvious that practically everyone is in a considerable “definitional” muddle.
Most of the confusion arises out of the various, more or less misguided attempts at describing the characteristics of this music. On one side there are the so‑called “purists” and their contention that r & b is the music played in those now almost familiar places on the Chicago South‑Side like “Smitty’s Corner”, small Negro clubs where people like Muddy Waters have made their name.
This is followed by the affirmations of people in the jazz‑world “proper” who claim that r & b‑in this country at least‑is the music played by a select number of blues‑minded jazz‑musicians who range from Graham Bond to Manfred Mann via Chris Barber.
A third category states that r & b is the music played at the Flamingo, by Georgie Fame, Tony Sheverton and the Shevelles, etc., yet another is that it is “the American Negro’s pop‑music”, and finally ‑ ‑‑some people hold the view that it is a rich mixture of Liverpool. Manchester, beat and pop Chuck Berry, the Cavern, Ray Charles, skiffle groups off‑beat accents‑‑in short all which sells at the moment
What is one to make of all this?
It is evident that before long we will he even more confused and that, a bit of tidying up would help clear the air.
To start with let us consider the music. We all know that the blues are very important elements in the evolution of jazz and pop music. This unique musical form ‑‑ the only one entirely original created in this century ‑‑ has very much been “the root” in the work of practically every jazzman. An interesting axiom presents itself to us here: “If every, jazzman knows the blues, not all bluesmen know jazz”.
The blues in fact are as many sided and distinct as flamenco or gipsy music; “delta bluesman” like Big Joe Williams for instance have not all that much in common with a “city bluesman” like Muddy Waters, etc. for in the end the “blues” becomes “the man” and from an “art‑form” it becomes “art”, living and individual.
Like the “Dixieland” forms of jazz have had great impact on the scene of “commercial” music so have the blues: the “boogie‑woogie” of the late thirties and early forties first brought the blues to the masses, The “city‑type entertainment” created the need for new dances. heavy rhythmical accents were put on the blues and “rhythm & blues” happened, almost by accident.
One of its “commercial” by‑products was without any doubt “rock and roll’ and the very early Elvis Presley records could very well he accepted as “white r & b”.
If the white man went commercial why should the Negro not benefit from the situation? Fats Domino, Little Richard and others became household names in the pop world. Their music certainly was r & b although nowadays their repertoire includes other material as well,
The Beatles ‑ avid listeners of records‑‑‑admit to having been greatly influenced by Negro “commercial” r & b artists, such as Arthur Alexander, James Roy, The Isley Brothers, etc. Chris Barber – who in 1958 brought Muddy Waters to England and whois himself a Chicago r & b fan- saidthat rock ‘n’ roll was rhythm andblues with the music taken out.”. In “Billboard”, America’s music business weekly, rhythm and blues records arethose that sell to the Negro population, even if it is Peter. Paul and Mary!
What about England? There are groups which profess to play themusic and clubs where these groupsplay, but again one meets the peculiar dichotomy we mentioned before,
Graham Bond for instance, is amodern jazzman with strong blues affiliations, George Fame, organistand singer admires Ray Charles, The Rolling Stones go for Bo Diddley.Jimmy Reed, Chuck Berry, so do the Yardbirds and a few others, Manfred Mann goes his own sweet way and Cyril Davies is generally known as the “Ken Colyer of British R &B”. So, that’s it: “BRRB”.
One fact is clear: r & b seems to have saved a lot of jazz-clubs from falling attendances. The Marquee. London’s jazz centre, features two r & b nights and is considering a third.The Flamingo packs them in with Georgic Fame, even Studio ’51 has three r & b sessions a week many other clubs, particularly out of London, are starting r & b nights.These are the formerly “jazz-based” clubs. But what about “r & b only clubs’?
As far as this writer knows in the whole London area there are only 6 of them.
To the question Is there an r & b scene in Britain we would like to pose the question and welcome readers’ views. G.G.
Thanks Alan, wonderful stuff.
They all loved that “negro music” didn’t they?
Not to mention all those “quotation marks”…
I love the reference to the National Jazz Federation – it has a distinct whiff of duffle coats, horn-rim spectacles and chin beards about it.
That’s the thing about music journalism from the 60s and earlier. It was uncharted territory, so you got weird things like all those superfluous quote marks.
A favourite is when they refer to a record topping “the charts”. Like it’s a mythical or non-existent thing they are referring to.
Depending on who was doing the writing, it also allowed them to display their condescension and/or contempt for the thing they were writing about, e.g. “the hit parade”, “rhythm and blues”, “beat music” etc.
(obviously this doesn’t apply to Giorgio’s piece above)
Knew of the guy mainly because I was a huge Yardbirds fan. If I’d been a couple of years older I would definitely have made it to the Crawdaddy (and Eel Pie Island). At least he made it past 69.
A couple of years ago I was in Richmond with my daughter and as we came out of the station I enthused about the Crawdaddy club which was originally located just across the road in the Station Hotel.
The pub had just reopened with a new name and in fact had gone through several renamings over the decades. But we went in for a drink with me continuing to wax lyrical about it being the birthplace of the Stones etc.
As I was paying for the drinks I tried to engage the young lass behind the bar in conversation about the pub’s musical history.
My questions were met with a blank stare and a disinterested shrug. That was the end of the conversation, but I couldn’t help feeling the new owners of the Station Hotel were missing a trick there.
Time to update your chat-up technique I think, Johnny?
I think she said something like “Rolling Stones? No idea, but don’t forget your change granddad”
Giorgio Gomelsky not only wrote the sleeve notes for the first Yardbirds LP Five Live Yardbirds but he also wrote Got To Hurry the B-Side of their hit single For Your Love under the name Oscar Rasputin
Here are Gomelsky’s sleeve notes for “Five Live Yardbirds”:
Very much of their time (1964). Great to see Hamish Grimes mentioned there. He not only introduced the band on Five Live Yardbirds but went on to design many famous LP sleeves.
And @colin-h will be pleased to know there’s a Mahavishnu connection here.
Giorgio Gomelsky produced Extrapolation the 1969 debut LP by John McLaughlin. It was originally released on Giorgio’s own Marmalade records label.
http://i.imgur.com/mA3cGoL.png
The introduction to “Five Live Yardbirds” – was he the first person to refer to Eric as “Slowhand”?
I think he was also the one who coined “blueswailing” and used it extensively in publicity for the Yardbirds.
The “Slowhand” nickname was Giorgio too, I think:
From Wiki: Yardbirds’ rhythm guitarist, Chris Dreja, recalled that whenever Clapton broke a guitar string during a concert, he would stay on stage and replace it. The English audiences would wait out the delay by doing what is called a “slow handclap”. Clapton told his official biographer, Ray Coleman, that, “My nickname of ‘Slowhand’ came from Giorgio Gomelsky. He coined it as a good pun. He kept saying I was a fast player, so he put together the slow handclap phrase into Slowhand as a play on words”
A suitably groovy release from Marmalade Records:
http://i917.photobucket.com/albums/ad15/camplimp/JulieDriscollUK_zps6wd08tep.jpg
Even the paper sleeves were cool
Eric’s really giving Giorgio the side-eye in the OP picture isn’t he?
“You’ll never catch me growing a fucking beard…”
Here’s the background to that picture. It was taken at the home of Baron Ted Willis, the Labour party activist and TV screen writer (he wrote Dixon Of Dock Green and many other programmes for the BBC).
In 1964 the Yardbirds played an impromptu gig in his back garden. Seems it was a publicity stunt organised by Giorgio Gomelsky, after Ted Willis had criticised The Beatles and other current pop music.
http://i.imgur.com/mRCOigx.jpg
And here’s a wider shot of the picture in the OP showing young Eric looking on while the grown-ups (Giorgio and Ted) talk
http://i.imgur.com/4zr7Ocf.jpg
Here’s another great photo from that meeting – Lord Ted in his Sunday casuals entertains the youth of today on his tennis court. At least three of the Yardbirds are thinking “Eric’s not wearing a shirt and tie – why did I have to wear a shirt and tie?”
http://i917.photobucket.com/albums/ad15/camplimp/524766023_zpstzzfuokw.jpg
Eric’s thinking “One day I’ll have enough money to buy a house with a tennis court.”
Either that or “shoes with no socks?!?!? What a bohemian!”
And “those shorts are little TOO short for a man of his age”
Honestly though, I cannot get over how YOUNG Clapton looks in those pics. What was he, 18? 19?
Born in March 1945 so, yes, he’d be 19 in the summer of 1964 (we can tell it’s summer because of Ted’s shorts).
Basking in the warming glow of the white heat of technology, doubtless…
“Why don’t you get your hair cut mister?”
Another shot from the same afternoon
http://i.imgur.com/uY2CnKV.jpg
That’s a brilliant photo. The clothes, the body language, the clash of two worlds. The kids really do look like something out of Enid Blyton.
Or, Five Go Mad after meeting the Yardbirds.
Here’s what I wrote about Karyobin in a 1996 issue of Record Collector (with a couple of modern footnotes).
Island ILPS 9079 – THE SPONTANEOUS MUSIC ENSEMBLE – KARYOBIN (ARE THE IMAGINARY BIRDS SAID TO LIVE IN PARADISE)
Karyobin Part I Karyobin Part II
• Release Date 1968
• Highest Chart Position none
• Musicians Derek Bailey – guitar John Stevens – drums Dave Holland – double bass Kenny Wheeler – flugelhorn and trumpet Evan Parker – soprano sax
• Producer Eddie Kramer
• Studio Olympic Sound Studios, London
• Recording Date 18th February 1968
• Cover Design David Chaston
• Sleeve Notes Victor Schonfield
• Painting of Karyobin Robert Macauley
• Liner Photography John Kilby
Unlike the other quality prog labels (Deram and Vertigo spring to mind), Island never really seemed entirely comfortable with jazz (or jazz-rock, for that matter) in all its myriad forms. In fact, of all the pink label releases, only really the SME and If (plus, at a pinch, The Alan Bown), wildly different though they are in approach, could be safely classified as such.
Featuring such seasoned free-form jazzers as Derek (wrongly credited as “Dennis” on sleeve and label) Bailey, John Stevens, Evan Parker, Kenny Wheeler and Dave Holland, Karyobin does not, it must be said, make for particularly easy listening. Consisting of just two untitled, side-long slabs of structureless improvisation (guaranteed room-clearers both), this must surely rank as one of Island’s most ambitious projects of any era and is almost certainly the most bizarre thing that producer Eddie Kramer ever put his name to.
Still, full marks to Blackwell & Co for giving an airing to such a challenging, synapse-shredding release – even if it did sink without trace amid the label’s big-name blues/psych/rock albums of the day.
Originally issued as a curious Island/Hexagram Records hybrid (label and sleeve carry both logos), disappointing sales ensured that today this is one of the most elusive pink label LPs of all, with a current asking price in excess of fifty pounds (more like £300 in 2016).
Alongside the expected ILPS 9079 catalogue number, the label shows, in brackets, a second, unexplained designation: (ILPS 60). This anomaly also crops up – as ILPS + 60 + A2/B2 – as the matrices. What can it all mean? While the back cover boldly claims Hexagram to be “A division of Island Records”, surely Chris Blackwell’s largesse didn’t extend to granting the offshoot its own numbering system within – but separate from – the main Island 9000 series? Answers on a £5 note to the usual address please.
A genre classic, apparently. File under: Impenetrable.
• Known Label Variations 1st pink label, then deleted
• Currently available on CD Chronoscope/Harmonia Mundi CPE 2001-2 (now also deleted)
http://i.imgur.com/bevCEO3.jpg
There are a few tracks by the SME on the Tube,
Karyobin
Here they are a few years later live in Oslo in 1972.